the PDF file. This is a
6.8 Mbyte file and will take about 39 minutes
to download at 28.8. To view and print the file, you
will need to download
and install the free Acrobat Reader Program.

View a picture of the proposed
bridge site
By John Heiser
The regular quarterly Baptist Road Rural Transportation
Authority (BRRTA) meeting scheduled for January 17 was canceled. A special
meeting was held February 21. County commissioner Jim Bensberg was absent
attending a funeral.
During the course of the meeting, county administrator Terry
Harris reported that one of the issues in his on-going discussions with the
Wal-Mart developer and the Struthers Ranch developer is construction of a bridge
over the drainage way and mouse habitat that bisects
the Struthers Ranch property. The bridge is needed to complete Jackson Creek
Parkway-Struthers Road south to connect to Northgate Road.
Harris estimated the cost of the bridge at $1 million
although other estimates have put the price as high as $2 million. Harris said,
"We will put the $1 million into the bridge." Funding for the bridge
has reportedly been proposed to be handled through an Additional Funding Request
(AFR) appropriation against the drainage fund. The AFR would require approval by
the board of county commissioners. Harris estimated the bridge would require one
year for design and one year for construction.
The BRRTA board is composed of three county commissioners (Bensberg,
Chuck Brown, and Wayne Williams) and two Monument board of trustees
representatives (Mayor Betty Konarski and Trustee Byron Glenn).
Election
The following slate of officers was unanimously approved:
President – Glenn; Vice President – Williams; Secretary-Treasurer –
Konarski; Assistant Secretary-Treasurers – Bensberg and Brown.
BRRTA’s Legality questioned
Pleasant View resident Tim Hibbs said Steve Plank’s letters
in the past two issues of Our Community News raised questions about the
formation of BRRTA. Hibbs said, "I am concerned that the authority was
formed without true representation of people affected by BRRTA. Since only two
people voted, your authority should only extend to them. Instead it extends to
lots and lots of people through fees and assessments." Hibbs characterized
the way the authority was formed as not in keeping with democratic principles.
He said the boundaries are an example of gerrymandering.
Peter Susemihl, attorney for the Triview district, who was
also involved in the formation of BRRTA, described how special districts are
often formed when there are no residents. In the case of the statute authorizing
rural transportation authorities, the law requires that residents vote. Susemihl
said, "Phil Weinert called me and said, ‘If you need electors, I am
willing to put my property into the district.’ This is not atypical of how
these things are done. It is totally legitimate, totally legal. The intent was
not to include any other existing developed properties."
Brown added, "It was [the Weinerts’] desire to see the
road built."
Williams said, "The idea is to allow growth to pay its
own way. The purchasers of land or homes can decide whether they accept the fees
or not." Brown added, "The choice is with the person who buys in the
district. It is a personal choice."
In August 2002, the BRRTA board voted to force inclusion of
the Brookharts and Total parcels into the authority. The owner of the parcels
leased to Brookharts vigorously opposed the inclusion.
James Hunsaker from law firm Grimshaw & Harring,
representing BRRTA, said, "The period for challenging the formation of the
district is past. The authority is operating within the statute."
Resident Steve Plank said there is only one other rural
transportation authority (RTA) in Colorado. It is the Roaring Fork RTA in the
Aspen area. The vote to form that authority included all the voters in the seven
affected cities and counties. Plank said, "They didn’t want to exclude
opposition." Regarding BRRTA, Plank said, "Citizens up and down
through there feel they should have a right to vote."
Plank noted that the RTA statute, C.R.S. 43.4.6, appears to
be largely copied from the public highway authority statute, C.R.S. 43.4.5,
except that the ability to collect fees when building permits are issued was
specifically omitted from the RTA statute. He noted that BRRTA fees are
currently being collected when building permits are issued.
Williams suggested that if Plank feels the district is not
operating legally he could bring a legal challenge.
Financial Report
Conner Shepherd, BRRTA project manager, distributed copies of
an accountant’s report showing estimated expenditures for calendar year 2002
of $236,752 including $180,710 for engineering design, $22,000 for district
management, $20,000 for construction of the right turn lane on westbound Baptist
Road at Leather Chaps, and $11,204 for legal expenses. Total 2002 revenue was
estimated at $105,334. During 2002, the general fund was estimated to have
declined from $413,269 to $281,851. The adopted budget for 2003 calls for the
fund balance to decline further to $65,551 due in part to projected engineering
design expenses of $190,000, a contingency fund allocation of $100,000, and
estimated total revenues of $105,000.
County planning status
Carl Schueler, assistant director of the county planning
department, reported on four projects being processed that lie within the
authority.
Hay Creek Ranch
The 10 lots in the approved Hay Creek Ranch plan will
contribute a total of $5,000 in BRRTA fees when building permits are issued.
Forest Lakes
Despite a pending legal appeal of the May 2002 board of
county commissioners approval of the 467-lot Forest Lakes preliminary plan,
Schueler said the final plat is expected this year. He said the development
agreement is being negotiated; however, he predicted, "It will be quite
some time before development occurs." One of the remaining issues is
funding for a grade-separated railroad crossing on Baptist Road west of Old
Denver Highway.
Struthers Ranch
Schueler reported that the revised sketch plan for Struthers
Ranch was approved and the county is in active negotiations with the Struthers
Ranch developer regarding construction of Jackson Creek Parkway-Struthers Road
from the bridge site north to Baptist Road.
Wal-Mart
Schueler noted that county planning has not yet received an
updated traffic report in response to their request last September. The current
report is based on obsolete traffic counts, does not model traffic resulting
from completing Jackson Creek Parkway-Struthers Road south to connect with
Northgate Road, and does not model any access to the church and adjoining houses
to the east of the project.
Redirection of Wal-Mart fee
Susemihl faced questions and opposition from the BRRTA board
when he requested that Wal-Mart’s $233,000 BRRTA fee be redirected to the
Public Improvement Corporation (PIC) proposed to be set up to make road
improvements required for the Wal-Mart. Susemihl added, "Terry Harris
thinks it is important to finish that connection of Struthers south. The county
is going to do the bridge."
Harris said, "We need the BRRTA fee to do the [Baptist
Road/Jackson Creek Parkway] intersection. We need to build that intersection
before Wal-Mart opens."
Shepherd responded, "I am a little concerned about
impact fees being committed to construction when planning is not
completed." He said the total cost of the engineering design is $480,000
and added, "We do not have that kind of money without impact fees coming to
pay for that project."
Harris suggested that the BRRTA design project might be a
duplication of effort since the Colorado Department of Transportation (CDOT) is
designing portions of Baptist Road as part of the interchange design and the
Wal-Mart engineers will also be developing a design.
Konarski said, "The worst thing we can do is design this
thing twice."
Shepherd replied, "Your county DOT is with us every step
of the way."
André Brackin, county DOT engineering design group
supervisor, added, "The Wal-Mart submittal closely matches what Loris has
designed."
Brown said, "The county project is primarily Struthers
Road. BRRTA’s project is Baptist Road. There is no duplication of
planning."
The board deferred a decision on the redirection of the
Wal-Mart fee and requested that Harris present the Struthers Road elements and
costs at a future BRRTA meeting.
Steve Waldmann, resident of the Ridge at Fox Run, asked,
"Don’t you think it is appropriate that the agreements regarding the PIC
also be made available to the BRRTA board and the public?"
Baptist Road Design Project
Peter Loris, President of Loris and Associates presented an
update on BRRTA’s Baptist Road design project. Susan Watkins of public
relations firm Kezziah Watkins described the public process as "open,
comprehensive, inclusive, and fair." It started with interviews of members
of a variety of organizations including the county commissioners, BRRTA, the
Tri-Lakes land use committee, the Family of Christ Lutheran Church, and the
Trails and Open Space Coalition. Large public meetings were held at Lewis-Palmer
High School Mar. 18, 2002 and Oct. 28, 2002 with hundreds of people in
attendance. The March meeting collected hopes and concerns. The October meeting
presented two alternative designs and collected responses.
Peter Smith of Smith Environmental Services reported that the
environmental issues with the designs are the wetlands and the Preble’s Meadow
Jumping Mouse habitat. He noted four areas of mouse habitat near the proposed
expansion of Baptist Road.
Bob Ball of TransPlan Associates summarized the traffic
report they prepared under contract to Loris. The report used several prior
studies of the three-mile portion of Baptist Road from the railroad tracks west
of I-25 to just east of Tari Drive. Those studies included the 1998 Baptist
Road Corridor Study, the 2001 Forest Lakes Traffic Impact and Access
Analysis, and the 2001 Jackson Creek Development – Phase 1, Traffic
Impact Study.
The TransPlan report issued last August included weekday
average traffic counts along Baptist Road as measured in 1997 and again in
December 2001. They also measured average weekday speeds in December 2001. The
results were as follows:
| Section |
1997 |
Dec-01 |
2001 Avg. Spd |
| Old Denver Highway to I-25 |
1,840 |
3,430 |
40 |
| I-25 to Jackson Ck Pkwy |
5,850 |
16,480 |
- |
| Jackson Ck Pkwy to Leather Chaps |
- |
12,
315 |
45 |
| Leather Chaps to Gleneagle Drive |
5,620 |
8,590 |
47 |
The report calculated traffic levels for the year 2025/full
build-out using two differing projected land uses. The first (Alternative #1)
assumed the projected land uses from the land use map in the draft Monument
updated comprehensive plan. The second (Alternative #2) assumed the projected
land uses in the Jackson Creek/Regency Park development and rezoning plan. As
seen below, the latter produced somewhat higher traffic projections. This
dictated some additional turn lanes and longer turn lanes.
| Section |
Land Use Alt.
#1 |
Land Use Alt.
#2 |
| Old Denver Highway to I-25 |
27,900 |
29,100 |
| I-25 to Jackson Ck Pkwy |
53,500 |
55,200 |
| Jackson Ck Pkwy to Leather Chaps |
31,700 |
32,700 |
| Leather Chaps to Gleneagle Drive |
26,100 |
27,100 |
As part of their full build-out projections, Ball said
TransPlan assumed Baptist would be connected though to Highway 83 at Hodgen Road
and Jackson Creek Parkway would be connected north from Baptist to Highway 105
and south to connect to Struthers Road. TransPlan assumed that a "big
box" (e.g., Wal-Mart) shopping center would be built on the southeast
corner of Baptist and Jackson Creek Parkway directly south of King Soopers.
Ball said the analysis was done with and without the
extension of Mitchell Avenue south to connect to Baptist Road. The Mitchell
Avenue extension impact was seen mainly at and west of the Baptist Road Old
Denver Highway intersection. Minimal impact was seen on Baptist Road east of
I-25. Ball said TransPlan has not yet looked into the consequences of the
announced delay in construction of CDOT’s proposed changes to the Baptist
Road/I-25 interchange.
Keith Scoggins of Loris Associates presented the current
preferred alternative lane and grade configuration. It includes two lanes in
each direction with a landscaped median from Jackson Creek Parkway to Leather
Chaps. The right-in/right-out access directly from Baptist Road as shown on the
Wal-Mart site plan has been removed.
Scoggins said, "The grades are not too bad" but
then added that the stretch between Desiree and Tari would have a maximum grade
of 9.5 percent, only slightly less than the existing grade that he said,
"exceeds 10 percent." The county guideline for major arterials
recommends limiting grades to 5 percent. The recommendation for minor arterials
is 6 percent. For reference, the grade along Austin Bluffs Parkway east of
Nevada is between 6 percent and 7 percent. Scoggins said that to reduce the
grade to the recommended limit, "the cuts and fills would disturb a lot of
people." He suggested, "Leave the hill alone except for adding a
truck-climbing lane." Tari Drive resident Jim Ford seconded the idea of
additional lanes for the steepest portions.
Loris said the plan is to present the preferred alternative
at a public meeting to be held within the next month or two and then develop a
preliminary design for the whole corridor. When asked about including options
for phasing the improvements he noted the numerous moving targets including the
Wal-Mart proposal, CDOT’s funding for the interchange, and the economy.
Williams made a motion that the preferred alternative be given preliminary
approval and taken to a meeting to solicit public comments. The motion was
unanimously approved with the exception of Brown who had left the room.
Open records policy
Shepherd distributed copies of a letter responding to Plank’s
request to review BRRTA’s public records. Plank had visited Shepherd’s
Greenwood Village office on Dec. 11 and was told he would have to request in
writing the records he wanted to see.
The BRRTA board adopted a resolution prepared by Hunsaker
requiring that a requestor "enumerate, as specifically as possible, which
records the person would like to review." The resolution also specifies
that copies "shall be $1 per page or the actual cost of copies whichever is
greater." It was suggested that an inventory of the records available would
be helpful to the public in making requests. Shepherd was directed to prepare a
list of the categories of records available but need not list each record
available.
The board approved public notification by posting of notices
on the bulletin board at the King Soopers.
Creekside Middle School fee
Konarski reported that meetings have been held with
representatives of Lewis-Palmer school district. Without being specific, she
said, "I think we are moving in the right direction."
Future Meetings
The next BRRTA meeting will be held Friday, Apr. 11, 1:30
p.m., at the Monument Town Hall, 166 2nd St., Monument.
Subsequent meetings are scheduled for Friday, Jul. 11, 1:30
p.m. at the county building, 27 E. Vermijo, Colorado Springs and Friday, Oct.
10, 1:30 p.m. at Monument Town Hall. Commissioner Williams said he may be unable
to attend the Jul. 11 meeting. It might be rescheduled.
**********
Articles on prior Baptist Road-related meetings are posted at
www.ourcommunitynews.org/top_stories.htm#baptist.
There is also background info at www.elpasoco.com/Transprt/baptist_rd.asp
and www.coalitiontlc.org/baptist_road.htm.
To get more information and provide comments on the Baptist
Road Improvement Project, contact:
 |
Peter Loris, Loris and Associates, 303-444-2013 x20, Some
information has also been posted at www.lorisandassociates.com/pages/proadbapt.htm |
 |
Conner Shepherd, BRRTA Project Manager, 303-779-4525 or
connershepherd@cliftoncpa.com |
 |
John Clack, Project Manager, El Paso County Department of
Transportation, 520-6851, johnclack@elpasoco.com. |
View a picture of the proposed
bridge site

recall of Huffman and Brown
With the Feb. 21 submission of over 25,000 names, the
decision on whether to recall two El Paso County commissioners appears headed to
the voters. The two county commissioners are Chuck Brown and Tom Huffman. They
joined with Duncan Bremer and Ed Jones, in approving expansion of the county
courthouse and jail despite the voters’ rejection of funding for the projects.
Recall proponents argue that during the development of these expansion plans,
the county commissioners did not sufficiently involve the public or pursue other
alternatives. Bremer and Jones left office in January due to term limits.
The recall organizers, Jan Martin and Chuck Murphy, submitted
to the county clerk more than 11,000 petition signatures from Tom Huffman’s
district and over 14,000 signatures from Chuck Brown’s district. Since each of
the County Commissioners are elected from their own district, only those
residents within the boundaries of Huffman’s and Brown’s district can vote
during this recall election.
The county clerk’s office has ten days to verify the
signatures by checking them against the voter registration for that district.
Then each of the county commissioners being recalled has fifteen days to file a
protest. Following that protest period, if the number of signatures falls below
the required number to force an election, the organizers have a short period to
gather more signatures to make the required number. 8,556 signatures are needed
in Huffman’s district and 11,199 are needed in Brown’s district. If the
requisite signatures are verified, the county clerk’s office has ninety days
to fix a date for the election.
On the ballot for a recall election, the first question
typically asks whether or not the elected official should be recalled. The
second question is typically who, of the candidates that have filed, should
complete the remainder of the official’s term of office. If a majority of
voters approve recall, the candidate that receives the highest number of votes
is elected.

View photos from the Open Road Tour
meeting Feb. 11
By John Heiser
Feb. 11: In an unusual move, three El Paso County
commissioners held a special meeting at Lewis-Palmer High School to hear from
residents. Some in the community observed that the meeting, one in a series
being held throughout the county, was prompted by the campaign to recall two of
the county commissioners, Tom Huffman and Chuck Brown. The recall was initiated
following decisions by the board to go ahead with plans for expanding the jail
and courthouse despite voters’ rejection of tax increases to fund the
projects.
Commissioners Jim Bensberg, Huffman, and Wayne Williams and
clerk to the board Eileen Wheeler attended. Commissioners Brown and Jeri Howells
were absent. Approximately 75 to 100 residents attended the meeting.
Woodmoor resident Joy Baldwin raised concerns about
overbuilding. She said, "I see it happening throughout the county. I urge
you to put a hold on more building until we resolve our drought problems."
Gleneagle resident Bill Howerton
objected to the county commissioners’ approval of the revised higher density
sketch plan for Struthers Ranch. He remarked to Williams, "Your predecessor
[Duncan Bremer] didn’t even show up for the hearing. He was skiing. To say we
were disappointed is an understatement. Can we expect better of you?"
Williams replied, "I will try to adjust my schedule to attend all meeting
where issues important to this area are discussed."
Fox Run resident Steve Waldmann cited a lack of communication
with residents regarding the jail and courthouse plans. He said, "You need
a white paper that gives the logic behind what you are planning." Williams
described the conditions that prompted the need to expand the jail. He said,
"It is a well-run jail but greatly overcrowded. Could the county have done
a better job communicating the consequences of a no vote? Yes. It is one of the
reasons we are here tonight."
Huffman added, "It should have been explained on the
ballot but there are strict rules on what can appear on the ballot. You can’t
say what the consequences are." He later said the arguments against the
ballot measures describing them as an effort to circumvent the Tax Payer’s
Bill of Right (TABOR) were not truthful. Regarding the jail, Huffman said,
"There are standards we have to meet. If you don’t maintain an adequate
jail, you have to release inmates. Other counties have been so ordered. The
federal government can also intervene. [Approval of the project] was an action
that needed to be taken. It was the responsible thing to do."
Abert Estates resident Richard Marciniak objected to the
Flying Horse Ranch project that has applied for annexation to Colorado Springs.
The project lies immediately south of Northgate Road and west of Highway 83,
covers approximately 1,600 acres, and includes more than 3,000 dwelling units on
about 700 acres, more than 200 acres of office and light industrial, about 100
acres of commercial and retail, a K-12 school site, a conference center-resort,
and a private golf course. Marciniak said, "It grossly violates the Black
Forest, Tri-Lakes, and Northgate plans. We hope the county commissioners will be
our allies in this and make comments to the city on our behalf. The surrounding
neighbors are virtually universally opposed to the proposal." The planned
use of groundwater for golf course irrigation is a major issue with the project.
Williams replied, "We have no control of what land is annexed. With
annexation, the water rights flow to the city. The city is saying in a drought
they plan to mine the aquifers."
Ken Rowberg, director of the county planning department,
added that Flying Horse Ranch developer Classic Communities’ request to the
county for approval for grading, seeding, and irrigation of the golf course
while it awaits a decision on the annexation request has been revised to a
grading request only. Rowberg said Classic will be asked to withdraw the
request. He added, "We feel there are portions of their plan that are
inconsistent with the Black Forest and Tri-Lakes comprehensive plans."
El Paso County Chief Judge Gilbert
Martinez described numerous courthouse remodeling projects implemented
during the past seven years. He said, "The inn is full. We have moved
everybody out of the building that we can. We don’t have any more space for
judges. Jurors are sitting on the floor. Victims and defendants are sitting in
the same area. You deserve better." He cited a number of cost and
efficiency advantages to having the expansion adjacent to the existing
courthouse.
Fox Run resident Ronald Henrickson expressed concern that
"rapid growth is not following any plan. The Baptist Road interchange is at
level-of-service F and funding is not likely for about a decade. It is
inappropriate to even consider rezoning [the proposed Wal-Mart site] to regional
commercial when the infrastructure can’t support it. Wal-Mart at this point
doesn’t make sense. It is not compatible with the area."
Huffman said, "Roads are a constant challenge for us –
one of the hardest things we face. Woodmen Road is being built with a ton of
money ‘extorted’ from developers." Huffman’s reference to extortion
is puzzling since the Woodmen Road expansion is being funded through a special
district approved by the board. The developers are providing the funding for the
roadwork by purchasing doubly tax-exempt bonds that will be repaid to them with
interest by property taxes levied against future property owners in the
district.
Williams noted that the county’s road and bridge property
tax mill levy is higher than any other Front Range county but still lower than
the library district’s mill rate.
Pine Hills resident Steve Phillips expressed concern that the
county commissioners approved the Forest Lakes project without requiring the
developer to construct a grade-separated railroad crossing on Baptist Road. He
said the crossing is needed for emergency access to the Twin Valley area and
added, "Too bad we weren’t able to extort that from the developer. The
developer extorted something from us."
In response to a question from Jackson Creek resident Bill
Miller about the impact of the military call-up, Sheriff Terry Maketa said that
out of 390 deputies, 24 are reservists. He said that since the call-up is based
on specialty it is unlikely that all 24 would be called up at once. The most
they are expecting at one time is seven. He concluded, "We don’t expect
it to affect service."
Maketa described deputies’ recent use of the holding
facility at the Colorado Springs police station off north Academy Blvd. to
reduce the time it takes them to process arrestees. Maketa said, "I think
it has already resulted in an increase in patrol time."
Black Forest resident Steve Plank urged the commissioners to
take a look at the Baptist Road Rural Transportation Authority (BRRTA). He said,
"This is the worst emasculation of the democratic process I have ever
seen."
Former commissioner and BRRTA board member Duncan Bremer
staunchly defended the formation and operation of BRRTA. He said the traffic on
Baptist Road increased from 4,000 average daily vehicle trips in 1995 to 12,000
to 14,000 per day now. He said, "The county didn’t have the resources to
make it work. The legislation said only residents could vote. Two residents
volunteered to help." Bremer added, "[BRRTA] is on track to get the
job done."
Regarding the BRRTA fee structure, Bremer said, "$500
per new house will contribute close to half the cost of the improvements. We
planned to get the other half from commercial."
Bremer’s statement is surprising since the cost of the
Baptist Road improvements is estimated at between $5 million and $10 million. To
fund half of that through $500 per house would require 5,000 to 10,000 houses to
be built within the district. Current plans do not call for anywhere near those
numbers.
Kingswood resident Carol Farmer characterized the formation
of BRRTA as a deal put together in a smoke-filled backroom. She asked, "How
can we dissolve this group that was formed without public input?"
Monument resident Michael Hess said, "You have very
little hesitation to approve small lot sizes next to large lots. Are you
concerned that in 20 years this area will look a lot like Orange County,
California? If so, what are you doing about it?" The question drew applause
from the audience. Williams cited the 300-year water availability rule as
"the largest restriction on growth." He added that small area plans
are also considered but then dismissed the concern saying, "I don’t
envision northern El Paso County looking like Orange County."
Bensberg said, "Government ought to be a participatory
sport. It is valuable to know what your vision is." He encouraged residents
to attend board meetings or watch them using the county’s web site. Williams
agreed saying, "We appreciate your concern for the community." Huffman
added, "E-mail is a great way to communicate with us."
**********
Commissioner Wayne Williams’ direct phone number is
520-6411. His email address is waynewilliams@elpasoco.com.
The county’s website address is www.elpasoco.com.
View photos from the Open Road Tour
meeting Feb. 11

Spaatz Lane right-of way
By John Heiser
At their Feb. 18 meeting, the El Paso County Planning
Commission recommended approval of the release of the Spaatz Lane right-of-way.
The recommendation was conditioned on reservation of a 30-foot right-of-way for
possible extension of Rickenbacker Avenue to the boundary of the Forest Lakes
residential property. Past suggestions that Rickenbacker be extended have met
with opposition from the neighbors.
Eberhard Klotz and Jens Zimmermann appeared before the
commission and requested that the approximately 380-foot-long right-of-way
between their two properties be removed. The right-of-way was created in 1957 as
part of Pine Hills Addition 4. The original intent was to provide access to the
Forest Lakes property to the south. The road was never constructed. The approved
Forest Lakes preliminary plan proposes use of Lindbergh Lane rather than Spaatz
Lane for access between Forest Lakes and Pine Hills.
The planning commission recommendation will be forwarded to
the El Paso County Board of County Commissioners for final action. If approved,
each of the two parcels would receive half of the land.
Another Tri-Lakes area item appeared on the agenda but was
continued to a future hearing. It was a proposal to place two 8 by 12-foot signs
on the Monument Business Park property east of Monument Hill Road and
approximately one-quarter mile south of County Line Road. Since the size of the
proposed signs exceeds what is allowed in the property’s C-1 zone, a special
review hearing must be held before the signs may be constructed.
Other Tri-Lakes area projects to be heard at future planning
commission hearings include final plats for Misty Acres Filing 2 and Greenland
Preserve Filing 1.
The 124-acre Misty Acres development is east of Monument Hill
Road and west of Doewood Estates. The final plat for Filing 2 shows 22
single-family lots and four multifamily lots on 59 acres.
Greenland Preserve, formerly known as Greenland Forest, is
located roughly one mile east of I-25 on the south side of County Line Road. The
preliminary plan was approved for 51 single-family lots on the 55.6 acres. The
final plat for Filing 1 shows 20 single-family lots on the easternmost 22.7
acres of the parcel. Lot sizes range from 22,000 square feet (0.52 acre) to
136,000 square feet (3.1 acres), with an average of about one acre.
**********
The planning commission normally holds hearings on the third
and, if necessary, the fourth Tuesday of each month. The next hearing will be
Mar. 18. The agenda for that hearing will be posted at http://adm.elpasoco.com/planning/Agendas/PC/PC-Agn.asp.
The hearings are held in the 3rd floor hearing room of the county building, 27
E. Vermijo, Colorado Springs.
For more information on these and other projects within the
county, contact the planning department at 520-6300 or visit www.elpasoco.com/planning.

By Judy Barnes
New business licenses
Sandy Bauers Massage Therapy: Sandra Bauers will provide
therapeutic massages at An Escape Day Spa at the West End Center, 755 Highway
105.
Therapeutic Mountain Massage: Pamela Cherkofsky will
operate a mobile service offering therapeutic neuromuscular massages.
Resolution supporting an amendment to the Colorado
Revised Statutes to prohibit a county government from reducing road
and bridge taxes
This resolution supports a bill in front of the state
legislature, sponsored by Rep. Michael Merrifield, that prohibits a county
government from reducing road and bridge taxes below the rate imposed on Jan. 1,
2003, without the consent of the municipalities within the county. The Colorado
Municipal League, a nonprofit, nonpartisan organization that represents and
serves Colorado’s cities and towns, is willing to support Merrifield’s bill,
but wants municipalities to support it first. The bill would prevent the kind of
action taken by the El Paso County Board of Commissioners that recently reduced
the road and bridge tax by about $500,000 in order to make more funds available
to pay for new county jail facilities. This reduction withdraws funds needed by
the municipalities for maintenance and repair of roads and bridges. Palmer Lake
would lose between $700 and $1,000 in road and bridge funds. After some
discussion, the resolution passed 5-2, with Trustees Eddie Kinney and Chuck
Cornell dissenting.
Committee reports
Parks and Recreation: Trustee Cindy Allen reported on the
fitness program at the town hall. Classes meet Tuesdays and Thursdays, 10-11
a.m. The cost is $2.50 per class for a prepaid four-week session and $2.00 per
class for a prepaid eight-week session.
Water: Trustee Chuck Cornell reported that, based on the
report by Steve Orcutt, water treatment plant operator, as of Feb. 6 the
reservoir contained approximately 63.5 acre-feet of water. With 15 percent of
that unusable due to silt, 54 acre-feet remain, enough for 3.9 months of use. If
no water is added to the reservoir, the town will be out of surface water by the
end of April or early May. Storage rights for the reservoir end midnight on
March 15. Water added to the reservoir after that does not belong to the town.
The new Arapahoe well could be used for emergencies, but has no filtration
system in place. The D-2 well can be used for 45 days, but then has to recharge
for up to six months. "We need to continue conserving water," said
Cornell; "I don’t see us lifting any restrictions." Trustee Allen
added, "We need to reiterate [to Palmer Lake residents] that we are still
under water restrictions. I’ve seen people watering sod and washing
cars."
Roads: Trustee Randy Jones recounted that Bill Johnson,
of Cheyenne Mountain Bank, met with him and Roads Supervisor Bob Radosevich to
discuss a separate entrance and 200 to 250 feet of road to connect six more lots
in Lakeview Heights.
Police: Trustee Kinney reviewed the year-end police
report for 2002. Traffic citations increased from 318 in 2001 to 622 in 2002.
Community and Economic Development—Buildings: Trustee
Susan Miner reported that they were developing a brochure to market Town Hall
for corporate meetings. The building could accommodate small weddings with up to
75 guests.
Fire: Trustee Scott Russell asked the board to reappoint
Greg Lokken as chief; the board approved unanimously.
Mayor’s report: Mayor Nikki McDonald noted the water
fund is separate from the general fund. Money from the water fund cannot be used
to subsidize any other department.
Public input - Mari Arnett
The Arnett family lives on Wheatridge Street, next door to
Blane Pshigoda, whose Pomeranian dog was killed in December in his backyard by a
straight object, perhaps an arrow, while the Pshigoda family was away on
vacation. Mari Arnett expressed her dissatisfaction with the way the Palmer Lake
Police Department handled the situation. Her eleven-year-old son Chase was
accused of killing the dog, and the investigating officer questioned Chase’s
friends, which fueled the rumor mill, in Arnett’s opinion. She described
harassment by neighbors, some calling Chase "dog killer." Ten posters
of the dog’s dead body were put up within 50 feet of the Arnett’s home, some
facing their house. Due to the intolerable situation, the Arnetts decided that
Ramoca subdivision and Palmer Lake are not where they want to live anymore. They
have put their house up for sale.
Blane Pshigoda told the trustees he felt the police were very
professional and followed up on every lead he gave them. He put up the signs in
the neighborhood, offering a reward of $1,000 for help in finding his dog’s
killer. He maintained that he did so legally, following the advice of the animal
rights group, People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals.
Request for B & E Filling Station to expand
Contractor John Cressman presented a site plan showing the
proposed addition that would add 20 feet to the rear of the building. With the
added square footage, the building would require 20 parking spaces. There are
six spaces on site (behind the building), and the restaurant would like to use
14 spaces of the town’s parking lot. Trustee Miner mentioned that O’Malley’s,
Bella Panini, and the Villa also have parking problems, and have agreed that
lighted walkways from the town parking lot to all the establishments would be
desirable. Cressman said the merchants would get together and make the
improvements to the lot that would benefit the town. Miner added that signage
would be needed on the backs of the buildings, to be visible from the parking
lot and to draw people visiting the lake. Town Attorney Larry Gaddis warned
against setting a precedent and suggested forming a committee of three people to
pursue the plan. Trustees Miner, Jones, and Allen agreed to serve on the
committee.
Ballot issues
The trustees considered three issues for a special election
April 1. The first two would ask voters’ permission to retain excess revenue
from FY 2002 and 2003 for use by the various departments of the town; a third
issue would propose an occupation tax, or bed tax, on inns and lodges. Town
Clerk Della Gins noted that in the past, voters have never denied the town the
overage. "Last year was a fluke," said Gins, "because of the fire
issue." Some voters opposed the mill levy (four mills) for Palmer Lake’s
volunteer fire department. Gins explained that the excess revenue would not go
back to Palmer Lake residents; in this case, the money would go back to a large
corporation that made a lump sum payment of $19,000 for sales tax they owed for
the past five or six years.
Palmer Lake resident Patrick Duffy accused the trustees of
wasting the town’s money with a special election. Trustee Kinney explained
that they were having a special election for the occupation tax, which they had
to get on the ballot so the town could collect revenue from local inns and
lodges. Shortly after the meeting, Gins found out that TABOR law does not allow
a special election strictly for the purpose of addressing tax issues. The April
1 special election has been canceled and the tax issues will appear on the
November ballot.
The meeting adjourned at 9:05 p.m.

By Judy Barnes
5:30 p.m. Special Meeting
Trustee George Brown was absent. The special meeting was
called to discuss possible referendum issues for the November ballot and to
discuss board goals. Six possible referendum issues were discussed.
-
Retain excess revenue. This has been on a four-year
cycle. In the past three years, the 1999 ballot issue has allowed the town
to retain as much as $140,000 in FY1999 in the General Fund and as much as
$594,522 in FY2000 in the Water Fund.
-
Lodging tax. Town Attorney Gary Shupp described the
legality of a statutory town being able to place this on the ballot. He
explained the difference between a lodging tax and an occupation tax. This
would apply to any type of lodging. As a statutory town, Monument cannot
impose a percent tax, but could do a flat rate (i.e., $2 per occupied room
per night). Discussion ensued about how to set the amount and where the
money should go. Mayor Betty Konarski noted, for example, that it could go
to an economic development fund. Town Attorney Gary Shupp said he’d
investigate if there could be a sliding scale, based on what the lodging
establishment was charging. The Colorado Municipal League has been asked to
provide the town with information concerning how other statutory towns
levied lodging taxes.
-
Debt for well no. 9 from unassigned proceeds from the
one-cent sales tax for water capital improvements. A 1989 Referendum
authorized one cent of sales tax to be "pledged to assist in the
payment of water system improvements." This revenue is currently
estimated to generate $481,460 in FY2003. Due to TABOR limitations
(established in the early 1990s) for enterprise funds–such as the Water
Fund–the Water Fund can only accept $101,170 of this amount. A second
portion can pay for any general obligation backed water debt, which is why
the Debt Service Fund was established. This fund’s current annual
principal and interest payments are $257,075. However, these two portions do
not consume the entire $481,460–there is a $123,215 portion remaining and
unassigned. It is this unassigned annual portion of the one-cent water sales
tax that the town manager suggested could be applied to a new well (no. 9)
via a voter-approved bond issue. This would not be a new tax – simply the
voters approving the use of existing unassigned revenue for a new debt
instrument (bond) for a well using projected unassigned revenue from FY2003–FY2007
for a $910,505 well. The only legal restriction (from the 1989 referendum)
is that it must be used for a water system improvement (the town manager
thinks this is for capital system improvements). This would not result in a
tax increase for the voters; it is using existing water revenue. So, the
referendum question would be, "Should the currently unassigned portion
of the one-cent sales tax (located in the Town’s Debt Service Fund)
dedicated by a 1989 Referendum to water system improvements be used to pay
the $910,505 debt for a new water well?"
-
New debt for a Police Station/Town Hall. This concept
involves asking for new debt (a bond issue) to help pay for a new Police
Station/Town Hall/Water Administration complex that might include the
Chamber of Commerce and one or more special district offices that could
bring rent revenue to the mix. The difficulty with a revenue source is that
the town legally cannot increase the sales tax above 3 percent even with
voter approval and asking the voters to increase the property tax does not
raise significant revenues because each 1 percent of increase is only $2,500
annually. This concept will need a lot more work to maximize the annual rent
income. The town could make the building large and rent out space in it—to
the Triview Metropolitan District for instance. It could be a municipal
complex.
-
Storm drainage improvements. With the storm drainage
study included in the FY2003 budget, funding for the anticipated capital
improvements from the study would be in order for FY2004. However, as with
the Town Hall complex above, there is not a significant revenue source to
ask the voters to increase.
-
Home rule charter. This issue is on the board’s retreat
goals action plan. The town manager asked if the board was inclined to
direct the staff to determine if there is time to establish a charter
committee now with a goal of a referendum in November. The clerk will
research the timeline. The special meeting adjourned at 6:30 p.m.
6:30 p.m. Regular Meeting
Public comments
Stephanie Johnson, vice president of the West Oak Ridge
Homeowners’ Association, appeared before the board with several issues: red
paint on the curbs in front of fire hydrants is peeling; Candletree Circle
sidewalks are crumbling; the entry to the neighborhood needs landscaping, and
the group needs to know where the boundaries are.
Resolution #5 in support of an amendment to the Colorado
Revised Statutes to prohibit a county government from reducing road and
bridge taxes
This resolution supports a bill in front of the state
legislature, sponsored by Rep. Michael Merrifield, that prohibits a county
government from reducing road and bridge taxes below the rate imposed on Jan. 1,
2003 without the consent of the municipalities within the county. The Colorado
Municipal League, a nonprofit, nonpartisan organization that represents and
serves Colorado’s cities and towns, is willing to support Merrifield’s bill,
but wants municipalities to support it first. The bill would prevent the kind of
action taken by the El Paso County Board of Commissioners that recently reduced
the road and bridge tax by about $500,000 in order to make more funds available
to pay for new county jail facilities. This reduction withdrew funds needed by
the municipalities for maintenance and repair of roads and bridges. The motion
passed unanimously by roll call vote.
Ordinance # 3-2003: Approving the subdividing of the
severed parcel north of the town access road to Monument Lake
Trustee Glenda Smith said this ordinance should have been
presented with the park lane road ordinance passed Jan. 21. Mayor Konarski
agreed. The motion passed five to one, with Smith dissenting, due to the timing
of the ordinance. Smith noted the ongoing problem of receiving information so
late that they do not have enough time to examine it in depth.
Disbursements over $5,000
The board approved the following payments:
-
Community Matters, Inc., $7,005.57 (Comprehensive Plan)
-
GMS, Inc., $7,038.94 (10/26/02 to 12/27/02 services)
Broiler Room status
Town Treasurer Judy Skrzypek reported there was no change in
the status of the Broiler Room water tap fee receivable. Town Attorney Shupp
also had not heard from Jeff Jergensen, owner of the Broiler Room. The balance
due is $13,500. Shupp will send a return receipt letter to Jergensen, letting
him know the town needs to hear from him within 30 days.
Report of administrative approval of Puckett
subdivision
The town planner approved an application by Dr. Frank E.
Puckett, for a final plat (replat) and a final site plan. The application
qualifies as a minor plat, which is subject to administrative approval. The
property was originally platted as lots 7 and 8 of Monument Addition No. 3, with
the long dimension of the lots platted in an east-west direction. The applicant
wished to change the orientation of the lots to a north-south direction to allow
a second house to be constructed on the proposed lot 2.
Request to develop new town logo
Mayor Konarski requested the board’s permission to pursue a
new Town of Monument logo. Since the web site and the entry to town are both
being redesigned, Konarski felt the logo needed to be updated. One option would
be to let the community, including the Tri Lakes Center for the Arts, submit
ideas. Mayor Konarski will work with staff to develop the ideas suggested by the
trustees.
Farmer’s market
The summer outdoor market needs to find a new location. First
choice is the Big Red parking lot and lawn. Approval of the District 38 school
board is required.
The meeting adjourned at 7:35 p.m. to go into executive
session for legal advice regarding a recent court case involving drainage.

By Judy Barnes
Nathan Kamp, from Boy Scout Troop #17, led the Pledge of
Allegiance. Trustee Frank Orten was absent.
Resolution authorizing a contract with the Colorado
Department of Transportation (CDOT) for the Second Street sidewalk project
The town received an enhancement grant from CDOT for a
sidewalk on the north side of Second Street, from Highway 105 at the Interstate
25 overpass westerly to Beacon Lite Road. The town is responsible for the design
of the sidewalk and a 20 percent match of $29,000. CDOT is responsible for the
construction as a change order to their overpass project. The town’s match is
budgeted. The motion to approve passed unanimously.
Resolution adopting a fee schedule for FY 2003
Town Manager Rick Sonnenburg presented the FY 2002 fee
schedule, which had a few minor changes from the previous schedule. Trustee Doug
Warner suggested that next time the board receive a list of comparable fees from
other municipalities in the region so they could see if Monument’s fees are in
line with the others. The resolution passed unanimously.
Final payment to XKE Contractors for
Jackson Creek Parkway
The board voted unanimously to approve payment. Mayor Betty
Konarski addressed complaints about the uneven pavement on Jackson Creek
Parkway. CDOT still has to add another lift to their part of the road; then it
will match the pavement completed by Monument. Trustees Glenda Smith and Byron
Glenn noted the road should get top priority for snow removal for the safety of
the high school students. Triview Metropolitan District has not paid their share
of the project cost. Following a suggestion by Glenn, Town Attorney Gary Shupp
will review if the town can withhold Triview’s sales tax share until they pay
for Jackson Creek Parkway.
Status of the Broiler Room water bill
Town Treasurer Judy Skrzypek reported that Jeff Jergensen,
owner of the Broiler Room, signed the promissory note and made another payment
of $2,250 that day.
Report and discussion of personnel policies
Rick Sonnenburg conducted a survey of municipal personnel
policies by sending a 32-question survey to 50 cities, towns, and counties. He
provided a summary of the 29 responses he received, including his own
recommendations. The board discussed some of the policies that included
termination at will vs. for cause, progressive discipline, and snow day pay.
Property donation from CDOT
In January CDOT contacted the planning department regarding
whether or not the town would be interested in receiving a small parcel of land
located on the east side of Interstate 25, north of State Highway 105. Davenport
did not see a need for the property, but noted that it might be good for future
annexation by creating contiguity. However, the parcel could be a liability,
since it is not near any other town property. CDOT did not give a reason for
wanting to give this land away. Mayor Konarski noted the town could own the
land, but not necessarily annex it. Davenport will investigate the matter
further.
At 8:20 p.m., the board went into executive session to
receive legal advice regarding the Second Street eminent domain case.

By Judy Barnes
The Triview Metropolitan District Board of Directors held its
regular monthly meeting Feb. 26. Two Jackson Creek residents other than board
members were in attendance.
District manager’s report
Ron Simpson, Triview district manager, reported that there
was nothing new regarding Wal-Mart.
Simpson noted that 100 signs were up on the east side of the
Preble’s Meadow Jumping Mouse habitat, warning people to stay out of the
habitat area. Miles Grant and Jackson Creek Land Company split the cost of the
signs. Simpson said that if the signs do not work, U.S. Fish and Wildlife could
require a six-foot high chain link fence enclosing the mouse habitat, which
would be expensive and unsightly.
Regarding landscaping along Leather Chaps, Simpson received
two bids that were unacceptable—one too high, the other too low—and was
rebidding the project.
Development status
Rick Blevins, Jackson Creek Vision Development Company,
reported that CLC Associates, a commercial development company based in Denver,
is preparing a preliminary alignment, profile, and cost estimate to complete
Jackson Creek Parkway from Highway 105 to Struthers Road.
Blevins also described a proposed commercial development,
Monument Town Center, to be located on commercial property between I-25 and
Jackson Creek Parkway, northwest of King Soopers. The center could accommodate
two or three big box stores along with smaller retail businesses and
restaurants.
Attorney Peter Susemihl reported that Miles Grant of Monument
Properties agreed to pay for a new well to serve the 91 lots that he plans to
develop. Grant has two parcels of land; one north of King Soopers, across Lyon’s
Tail, and the other east of King Soopers between the shopping center and
Carriage Park.
Wastewater treatment plant
Simpson informed the board that discussions were underway to
determine the best way to expand the water treatment plant that currently serves
Donala, Forest Lakes, and Triview.
***********
The Triview Metropolitan District board of directors normally
meets on the fourth Wednesday of each month, at 6:30 p.m., at the district
office, 174 N. Washington St. The next meeting will be March 26.
For further information, contact the Triview Metropolitan
District at 488-6868.

By G. B. "Steve" Stephenson
Vice President/Treasurer, HJCCO
Residents of the Heights at Jackson Creek have been working
for a year to form a homeowners association to be called the Heights at Jackson
Creek Community Organization (HJCCO), amend the community’s covenants, and
establish a set of bylaws for the operation of the HJCCO. A public meeting will
be held March 13, with a vote following in April. A recounting of the steps
followed in this process should be helpful to Heights residents and residents of
other areas interested in forming a homeowners association.
Background
In Jackson Creek, there are a number of subdivisions or
filings. The Heights consists of Filing No. 1 and Filing No. 2, and includes 313
homes among the approximately 560 that are occupied to date within the Triview
Metropolitan District.
The builder for Filings 1 and 2 was Elite Properties of
America, Inc., better known as Classic Homes. Classic Homes filed a set of
Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions for Filings 1 and 2 with the El Paso
County Court. In addition, to complement the covenants, a set of design
standards was filed. The filing of these documents constituted the establishment
of a Covenant Controlled Community under Colorado law. Any buyer of property in
The Heights at Jackson Creek has agreed to and has the responsibility to abide
by the covenants.
The stated purpose of the covenants is, "a) to protect
and enhance the quality, value, aesthetic, desirability and attractiveness of
the property; b) to define certain duties, powers, and rights of owners of lots
within the property; and c) to define certain duties, powers and rights of the
Declarant." The Declarant was Classic Homes.
Until the fall of 2001, Classic Homes managed the affairs of
The Heights to include those cases involving covenants compliance. In September
2001, Classic Homes, following provisions in the covenants, transferred
covenants management to The Heights’ property owners. The covenants called for
a three-person property owner board to manage the community’s affairs. Classic
Homes solicited volunteers from the community. On September 30, 2001, Classic
Homes filed with the El Paso County Court a Reconstitution and Assignment of
Approving Authority for The Heights at Jackson Creek Filing No. 1 and Filing No.
2, officially transferring covenants management to the property owners.
The three-person board then set about organizing and
determining priorities. The board immediately recognized that the inherited
covenants were not sufficient to effectively and efficiently run the
organization. There were missing provisions such as those administrative
procedures found in a set of bylaws. Errors were also found. Of paramount
concern was the absence of annual assessments or dues that would fund the
expenses of managing the community’s affairs.
These findings were presented to property owners by mailings,
public meetings, and surveys during the spring of 2002. Feedback from property
owners reflected solid support for amending the covenants to include a limited
annual assessment, correction of errors, and preparation of a set of bylaws.
With no continuing source of funds, some property owners
contributed money to pay for the initial administrative expenses of organizing
the HJCCO. Subsequently, Classic Homes contributed funds in support of the
organization and its efforts to amend the covenants. With these limited
financial resources, the board continued to organize itself to include the
establishment of sector coordinators and other volunteers to assist in the
day-to-day management of the community’s affairs.
Considerable effort has gone into the drafting of the amended
covenants and related documents. The HJCCO board researched and wrote the
initial draft of the documents. In the fall of 2002, a local law firm was
selected to assist in the drafting of the amended covenants and related bylaws.
Much effort has also gone into working with the Triview
Metropolitan District Board and staff to better understand their role in
providing services to The Heights’ residents. The first area of concentration
was the general physical appearance of The Heights. The district has recently
committed to spend additional funds in 2003 to protect, maintain, and improve
the parks, trails, and common areas.
Status
By March 1, incorporation of HJCCO as a Colorado nonprofit
corporation is to be completed and draft amendments to the covenants and the
draft bylaws are to be mailed to all 313 Heights property owners. The most
significant change in the covenants is the addition of an annual assessment.
Based on a draft budget for the organization, the 2003 assessment for each lot
was set at $89 per year ($7.42 per month). The annual assessment will be
increased or decreased annually based on expenses. At the request of the
property owners, a maximum increase of 5 percent per year will be permitted.
Community meeting Mar. 13
A public meeting will be held Mar. 13, 7 p.m., at Creekside
Middle School to give a short history of the HJCCO’s activities over the last
year, to discuss the bylaws and the amendments to the covenants, and to solicit
comments and suggestions.
Following the public meeting, the bylaws will be
revised and adopted by the board and then annually reviewed and revised as
needed. The amendments to the covenants will be revised and final copies and a
ballot will be mailed to property owners on April 3.
Ballots must be completed, signed, and returned to the HJCCO
attorney’s office in Monument by April 24. In order for the amended covenants
to take effect, two-thirds of the property owners must vote in favor. This
all-important vote will culminate a year’s work. Continued interest, support,
and communications with neighbors concerning this project and community issues
are paramount.
**********
If you have questions or suggestions, contact G.B. Stephenson
at 488-2327 or by e-mail at peakview@codenet.net;
Kevin Barszcz, Vice President/Secretary at 487-0241; or Bob Lowes, Vice
President/Administration at 488-5605.

By Tommie Plank
The District 38 School Board has decided not to put a bond
issue on the ballot this coming November. Terry Casey of RBC Dain Rauscher, the
district’s bond counsel, presented information on the tax impact to property
owners. A new facility to house an additional 12,000 students, whether a second
high school or an expansion to the present high school campus is built, will
cost approximately $40 million. Assessed valuation in the state has gone down,
and the district now does not have the bonding capacity to legally ask for
enough money to build either high school project in its entirety, regardless of
which option might be selected. Casey said the tax burden to property owners
would be many times greater than has ever been requested, and noted that
property taxes will increase anyway to pay the current indebtedness, even
without a new bond issue. Smaller bond issues to phase in construction projects
would not do much to mitigate the cost to taxpayers. His advice to the board, in
light of this information and the current economic uncertainty, was against a
bond question in the near future.
The board will continue its investigation of the two high
schools versus an expanded high school campus in a series of community forums.
The present rate of growth will necessitate something being done soon. The high
school is nearly at capacity now, and modular units will most likely be required
next school year. The board felt that this delay should be used as an
educational opportunity. "Whatever is eventually decided (a second high
school or expansion to the campus)," said one board member, "people
that have moved here largely because of the reputation of the schools should
remember that the district 38 board and administrators, with the support of the
community, have a history of providing the very best educational opportunities
and facilities possible. That will not change."
Monument Mayor Betty Konarski and Town Planner Mike Davenport
presented their visions for developing Monument into "Old Town" and
"New Town" areas. Old Town, along Second Street from I-25 to Monument
Lake, would be a pedestrian-friendly area of historic buildings and
historic-looking small shops. New Town would be a multi-generational center with
Lewis-Palmer High School and the proposed YMCA joining together to provide
various educational, arts, and recreational activities. A system of trails to
connect the two areas is also part of the vision.
An updated three-year District Technology Plan was presented.
District Technology Supervisor Steve Endicott and the technology team worked for
several weeks to update the district’s plan, focusing on information literacy
with student learning at the center. There is also a very large staff
development component; this plan will form the foundation for using technology
in all areas of the district. Endicott, along with the members of the Tech Team—Rick
Tanski, Roy Saye, Tracey Lehman, and Robert Templin—were all commended for the
many hours they devoted to developing the plan.
A Board Commendation was given to Olga Fitzgerald, who
invites special education students in district 38 to experience horseback riding
at her Leather and Grace stable as part of their physical education program.
Dr. Jeff Ferguson acknowledged Superintendent Ted Bauman, who
was recognized for being named the Honor Administrator by the Colorado Music
Educators Association for his support of music education.
**********
The next regular meeting of the Board of Education will be
Thursday, March 20. The meetings are held at the Administration Building at
Second and Jefferson, and begin at 7 p.m.

View a photo of the meeting and the
response time map
By John Heiser
Potential merger with other fire districts in the Tri-Lakes
area was a major topic of discussion at the Feb. 20 regular meeting of the
Tri-Lakes Fire Protection District Board of Directors.
District merger working group meeting
Tri-Lakes district president Charlie Pocock reported that at
the Feb. 4 joint working group meeting, he sensed a change in direction. Instead
of a bottom-up approach based on commonality of policies and procedures between
the departments, he concluded the plan is to approach merger from the top down
looking at the structure of the governing body and the property tax mill levy.
Pocock said with the top-down approach, details such as personnel manuals do not
matter because only the resulting district’s policies and procedures will be
in force.
Pocock added that the working group is now talking about
inclusion rather than consolidation. With consolidation of two districts, both
are dissolved and a new district is formed that encompasses both former
districts boundaries. Inclusion means that one of the districts is merged into
the other.
District treasurer John Hildebrandt expressed concern that
the Woodmoor-Monument district board tabled the proposal for the Tri-Lakes
district to provide ambulance service to both districts. He said, "That
would be a definite benefit to Woodmoor-Monument district residents. Tabling
this proposal is not within the spirit of working together. If this was one
district, that would not be an issue." The Woodmoor-Monument district has
paramedics but currently contracts with American Medical Response (AMR) for
ambulance service. An AMR ambulance is often kept at the Wescott station on
Gleneagle Drive near Baptist Road. Citing the Tri-Lakes district’s ambulance
better response time for most of the Tri-Lakes area, Pocock said, "Getting
the patient to the emergency room is what is really important." Vice chair
Oscar Gillespie added, "They have to realize the benefit we are offering to
their residents."
Pocock reported that the maps for the five-minute drive time
coverage areas for the Palmer Lake Volunteer Fire Department, the Tri-Lakes
district, the Woodmoor-Monument district, and the Donald Wescott Fire Protection
District have been combined into one map. In the
overlapping areas, more than one district can reach those areas within five
minutes.
The map also shows several
areas that cannot be reached by any of the districts within five minutes. One
such area is near I-25 and County Line Road. Tri-Lakes chief Robert Denboske
reported that Tri-Lakes personnel recently drove the routes to that area and
concluded that the area can be reached from the existing Tri-Lakes and Woodmoor-Monument
stations within five minutes. The map is being updated.
Other areas with potential response time problems are Pine
Hills, Twin Valley, and Highway 83 south of Hodgen. Collecting additional drive
time data will refine the extent of the problem.
The working group is using the combined
coverage map to determine what changes to station locations would provide
the best response time improvements. One possibility being discussed is
relocation of the present Woodmoor-Monument station to King’s Deer Point and
Furrow Road.
Pocock noted, "If we chose six minute drive times, we
wouldn’t have a problem. It is really a decision for the new board [of the
combined district]."
Director Rick Barnes said, "My biggest concern is that
we are inundating staff with merger-related tasks. We need to keep this district
functioning."
Financial Report
Hildebrandt reported that district expenses are currently
running about 3 percent under budget.
Chief’s Report
Chief Denboske reported that the district handled 65 calls in
January. The breakdown was 28 medical, 17 fire, 13 traffic accidents, 5 public
assists, and 2 hazardous materials. 33 people were transported to area
hospitals.
Denboske also reported that the district has been restored to
full membership in the North End Group of fire chiefs. All automatic mutual aid
agreements have been restored.
EMS Report
Ron Thompson, assistant chief and Emergency Medical Services
(EMS) coordinator, reported that the district is making progress implementing
the new software for medical services billing and trip report writing. He said
the district is on schedule to meet the April 2003 deadline for electronic
billing to Medicare. He said the district will also be Health Information
Protection Act (HIPA) compliant by next month. HIPA mandates privacy of medical
patient information.
Thompson noted that Tri-Lakes has been certified to provide
training on ice rescue techniques. He added that there were two dog ice rescues
this year.
Station 2
Pocock reported that an agreement has been signed with the
Great Divide Water Company that owns the well next to Station 2. Under the
agreement, the district can use up to 54,000 gallons of water per month. Ninety
percent of the water used will be counted toward Great Divide’s water
augmentation programs. The agreement calls for protection of the wellhead and
allows for parking near the wellhead by Station 2 personnel.
Barnes said his architectural firm will restart work on the
project next week. The effort was put on hold awaiting the agreement with Great
Divide.
**********
The Tri-Lakes Fire Protection District board normally meets
at 7 pm on the third Thursday of each month at the district firehouse, 18650
Highway 105 (near the bowling alley). The next meeting will be held Mar. 20. It
is to be a joint meeting with the Woodmoor-Monument district.
For more information, call Chief Denboske at 481-2312.
View a photo of the meeting and the
response time map

View photos from the meeting
By John Heiser
At the Feb. 1 meeting of the Northern El Paso County
Coalition of Community Associations (NEPCO), newly elected county commissioner
Wayne Williams responded to residents’ questions and comments. Williams was
sworn in Jan. 14 to represent district 1 that includes the Tri-Lakes area and
extends south to Flintridge and Academy in Colorado Springs.
About 40 people attended the meeting. Numerous northern El
Paso County homeowner associations and residential areas were represented at the
meeting including Bent Tree, Chaparral Hills, Falcon’s Nest, Gleneagle, Fox
Run, King’s Deer, Nichlas Court, Sun Hills, The Heights at Jackson Creek, and
the Woodmoor Improvement Association
Election results
NEPCO President Steve Sery announced that the newly elected
officers are Dave Swanson, Falcon’s Nest resident, as vice president; Bob
Swedenburg, Gleneagle resident, as secretary, Beth Courrau, Woodmoor resident,
as facilitator. Chaparral Hills resident Sery continues as chair and King’s
Deer resident Glenn Scott continues as treasurer.
Land Use Committee Report
Bill Eckert, land use committee (LUC) vice-chair, described
how the land use committee reviews land use proposals and prepares comments that
are forwarded to the county planning department, county planning commission, and
the board of county commissioners. He said, "Our job is to take care of
people who live here." Eckert summarized the LUC’s responses to the
following recently reviewed land development proposals:
-
Struthers Ranch - The LUC comments raised concerns
about the Struthers Ranch sketch plan density transitions to Chaparral Hills
and Gleneagle. Eckert said, "Density transition is a big thing around
here."
-
Wal-Mart - Eckert said, "We did not give them
a religious no." He went on to say that if improvements to Baptist Road
are not constructed before the Wal-Mart is built, "We will find new
elected officials." The improvements are needed to restore public
safety that would be compromised from the doubling of Baptist Road traffic
that would result from the project. Other comments opposed the request for
Planned Unit Development (PUD) zoning, supported the county’s 300-year
water supply requirement, and raised concerns about neighborhood transition
issues, drainage, and potential environmental pollution from de-icing and
other chemicals.
-
Monument Business Park - LUC comments on the
project south of County Line Road and east of I-25, raised water supply,
density transition, and traffic issues.
-
Smith Creek drainage basin study - The LUC
provided comments on the study that was approved Jan. 21 by the county
planning commission.
-
Flying Horse Ranch – The LUC cited the proposed
use of groundwater for golf course irrigation as a major issue. The Flying
Horse Ranch project immediately south of Northgate Road and west of Highway
83 covers approximately 1600 acres and includes more than 3,000 dwelling
units on about 700 acres, more than 200 acres of office and light
industrial, about 100 acres of commercial and retail, a K-12 school site, a
conference center-resort, and a private golf course. The project has
requested annexation to Colorado Springs. While that request is being
processed, the developer requested permission from the county to do grading
and seed and irrigate the golf course.
LUC chair Dave Swanson added,
"If you don’t play in your local government, somebody else will and it
will probably be a developer. We stand to lose something important while we are
not paying attention."
Wayne Williams
Williams described efforts to improve communication between
the board of county commissioners and the voters. The recent series of
"Open Road Tour" meetings included the one held at Lewis-Palmer High
School Feb. 11 [See article].
Williams explained the county organization of five districts
and the other elected officials and departments with whom the county
commissioners must interact. He noted that there are seven elected officials who
do not answer to the board and added, "We can’t tell them how to run
their departments, subject only to some funding input from us."
He explained the various boards and government organizations
that he will be working with: the planning commission, the parks advisory board,
the sheriff’s office, the coroner’s office, and the housing authority. He
added that the planning commission, the housing authority, and the parks board
need volunteers.
Williams further explained that he has been designated as the
county commission liaison for law enforcement issues. He has also been appointed
to other positions including the board of the Baptist Road Rural Transportation
Authority (BRRTA).
Williams noted, "El Paso County takes the least taxes of
the top ten counties along the Front Range. Douglas County gets $503 per citizen
whereas El Paso County gets $147." He added, "We may not have the
money to do some of the neat things other counties do."
He provided a brief history of the county jail and
courthouse. He said the Criminal Justice Center jail is overwhelmed due to
population growth in El Paso County. He said, "If you don’t like who is
sent to jail, contact your state legislator." Regarding the courthouse,
Williams said that over the past decade five judges have been added. Five more
will be needed within the next five years. "We are exceeding the fire code
requirements when jurors are summoned." He said the county is currently
selecting an architect to design the courthouse expansion, which is scheduled
for completion in 2004. He outlined several alternatives to be considered.
Williams was critical of the use of county funds to support
bus service saying, "These decisions were all made before I got
there." He said the subsidy has at times exceeded $1,000 per rider and
asked, "Is this the best use of those funds?"
He stressed the importance of county cooperation with other
government agencies, including the towns of Palmer Lake and Monument, saying,
"We are trying to work with local government up here."
Swanson asked why the board of
county commissioners approved the revised, higher density Struthers Ranch sketch
plan despite the planning commission’s recommendation for denial. Williams
said the vote was very close (3-2). He added that usually the board goes along
with the planning commission’s recommendations, however, "The buck rests
with the elected officials; however, if the PC says it’s a bad idea, I want to
know why."
Swedenburg described BRRTA as a mutation of normal government
and asked, "Would you take an initiative to abolish BRRTA and take the road
under normal county maintenance?" Williams said he has concerns about the
efficacy of BRRTA and intends to fix the problems and make the organization
work. He went on to say, "Frankly, county and city developers build
roads." Typically, the county takes over responsibility for maintenance.
Williams said, "There is a $40 million backlog in road maintenance."
Swedenburg suggested, "If you can’t fix the roads, don’t approve
development. If you are going to allow development, fix it first. I lost a
friend who died on Baptist Road."
Tom O’Malley, who worked for 13
years as a city manager in Michigan, asked about the role of the Tri-Lakes
Comprehensive Plan in the commissioners’ deliberations on land use. Williams
said, "It is a valuable document. It is something I look at. It is not a
waste of time." He added that comprehensive plans are advisory and not
determinative.
Courrau described traffic enforcement problems in the
Woodmoor area and said, "Sheriff Maketa feels his hands are tied because
the board of county commissioners funds the sheriff’s department. I encourage
you to support additional funding." Williams said he would talk to the
sheriff about options to provide more traffic enforcement in the Woodmoor area.
The audience applauded when Woodmoor resident Ron Yamiolkoski
said, "It is not the responsibility of government to make developers whole,
to make their projects work. The reality is that we have all made an
investment." He added that each community has a quality of life, a
character, an image it wants to project. He said, "Wal-Mart is not in
keeping with the character of this community." Williams replied, "It
is a concern I am aware of. Individual property owners have rights and the
surrounding property owners have rights."
Williams closed by saying it is very clear to him that NEPCO
is involved with land use issues and wants land use management in northern El
Paso County to continue to involve its residents.
Sery asked members what they would like to see at general
membership meetings. Yamiolkoski suggested it would be very useful to have past
guest speakers return to give updates on topics like water usage and county
planning and thus maintain a strategic dialog.
**********
Portions of this article were based on minutes taken by NEPCO
secretary Bob Swedenburg.
The next NEPCO meeting will be held April 5, 9:30 a.m., at
the Woodmoor Barn, 1691 Woodmoor Drive, across from Lewis-Palmer Middle School.
For more information about NEPCO, contact Steve Sery at
488-8533 or seryj@earthlink.net.
Commissioner Wayne Williams’ direct phone number is
520-6411. His email address is waynewilliams@elpasoco.com.
The county’s website address is www.elpasoco.com.
View photos from the
meeting

By Chris Pollard
The Woodmoor Improvement Association (WIA) met only once in
February because of snow. Susan Cooley, vice president of the WIA before the
recent election, chaired the meeting, Feb. 19.
The only item raised by a visitor was from Gloria Ingram, who
had concerns with the new weeds and mowing proposal. In response, the board
noted that more than 150 responses had been received by e-mail regarding this
issue and that a committee will be formed with representatives from both sides
of the issue. John Otino, recently elected to the board, added that he thought
the new rules should more clearly address noxious weeds. There were also some
concerns over the exact nature of responsibility for the condition of the county
easement next to the roads.
In line with requests to better control the time schedule for
board meetings, Susan Cooley announced that in the future, visitor comments
would be limited to three minutes each at the start of the meeting.
Election of new officials followed. Cooley was unanimously
elected the new WIA president. John Otino was elected vice president. Wayne
Pinkstaff was assigned to the covenant director’s position. Bonnie Hawkins,
the third new board member, was assigned to the Forestry and Common Areas
position. All other returning members of the board remained in their positions.
In her president’s report, Cooley noted that in the future,
meeting agendas would be published on the Friday before meeting. She also handed
out a list of items that had come up on the agenda in previous meetings that
might still need to be addressed. Pinkstaff was assigned to run the meetings to
investigate the proposed weeds and mowing rules. Further research and work was
also slated regarding satellite dishes, fence rules, and the issue of the
Walters’ property development in South Woodmoor.
John Haines, director of the architectural control committee
(ACC), announced that there were only two new homes approved for the month and
no additions. Two more roofing colors had been approved by the ACC, and these
may be added to the permanent list by vote at another meeting.
Kevin Nielsen, chief of Woodmoor Public Safety, reported on
his meeting with the county sheriff regarding possibly employing county officers
to patrol the Woodmoor area. Given that residents are already paying for similar
services directly through property taxes and given questions of who would direct
their efforts, the matter remained unresolved.
Camilla Mottl, executive director, gave a summary of the
responses to the e-mail request for input on the proposed weeds and mowing
rules. It was noted that there were more than 150 responses, with 68 people for
the new rule and 50 against. The remainder of the responses did not give a
direct for or against response but provided comments and suggestions. More than
1,300 people were polled in this survey.
**********
The next meeting of the WIA board will be March 5. The board
normally meets the first and third Wednesday each month, 7 p.m., at the Woodmoor
Barn, 1691 Woodmoor Drive. For information, call 488-2694 or visit www.woodmoor.org.

By Tim Watkins
Owner, Balanced Rock Bike and Ski
A meeting to discuss the proposed oil drilling lease easement
on the area around Mount Herman Road was held Feb. 19 with about thirty people
in attendance.
Dyad Oil Company from Midland, Texas, has a lease on several
thousand acres of forest service land, and began the process of searching for
oil and gas several months ago. The company did find possible geological sites
about four miles up the road and has begun the initial process for drilling
exploratory wells. The forest service and Dyad is working on the best possible
ways to go about this.
Tim Grantham from the U.S. Forest Service spoke to the group
about the possibilities and the likelihood of Dyad pursuing the endeavor. There
are some arrangements that have begun, but Dyad has not completed all of the
required forms at this point. The company will be drilling from the eastern side
under Mount Herman into a site on the other side under Limbaugh Canyon.
The meeting was informative, but inconclusive. Community
involvement is the next step for concerned citizens. More information can be
obtained by contacting the U.S. Forest Service district office in Colorado
Springs, 636-1602, and the local trails advocacy group Friends of Monument
Preserve through Balanced Rock Bike and Ski, 488-9007.

At the Baptist Road Rural Transportation Authority (BRRTA)
board meeting on Feb. 21, I asked BRRTA to live up to the language of their
public meetings and specifically the language of the contract between the Town
of Monument and El Paso County. Or, in the alternative, offer a compelling
reason as to why they would go back on their word to their constituents.
In required public meetings prior to the election, BRRTA said
they were not going to charge any fees until they had a final plat of the
improvements to Baptist Road. And in the contract they said, "It is the
intention of the parties to this Contract that no fees, charges, or other
assessments will be imposed or collected prior to the filing of a final
plat." After more than five years of BRRTA, there is no plan for Baptist
Road, much less a final plat. Yet, BRRTA has been collecting fees for years. The
BRRTA board declined to address this issue.
In these same public meetings, BRRTA said they were not going
to take in developed properties. In the contract they said, "It is further
the intention of the parties to this Contract that future inclusions of real
property will involve parcels similar to the initially included parcels; i.e.
vacant lands with development potential that will impact Baptist Road." In
the minutes of the Nov. 12, 1999 BRRTA board meeting, after BRRTA’s sales tax
proposal had been defeated, Conner Shepherd said, "Callers did not
understand or accept the explanation that only areas that were to be developed
were included in the Authority boundaries. Some callers felt the boundaries were
contrived—gerrymandered precisely so they couldn’t vote. … And some
callers were upset that they couldn’t vote though they would be the ones to
pay the tax." Yet in 2002, after all of this insistence by BRRTA that they
would not take in developed properties, BRRTA annexed the Total Station. Over
the objections of the Watt family and their attorney, BRRTA took in the Watt’s
family land, including the former Brookhart’s.
BRRTA’s response to this at the Feb. 21 board meeting was
given by the same Conner Shepherd. He said they took in these developed
properties so they could charge fees if there was any further development of the
properties. It should be noted that in a Jan. 19, 2003 story in the Colorado
Springs Gazette, Shepherd said, "Watts’ property was annexed to square up
the boundaries." Are either of these compelling reasons to go against BRRTA’s
repeated public assurances or the language of their contract?
The truth is that BRRTA’s entire argument that they could
choose their own voters and vote themselves into power is based on their highly
questionable legal theory. They had no developed property in their boundaries;
the law required a vote of electors in their boundary; therefore, they were
forced to choose a developed property with electors. Of course, they should have
drawn their boundaries to include all of the affected voters along Baptist Road,
but that would have meant that everyone would have been allowed to vote—even
those who opposed BRRTA.
Stephen C. Plank

In these troubled times of tragedies, recession, impending
war, and other stresses, it breaks my heart to see our lovely community so torn
apart by dissenting voices. There is bickering over BRRTA, land ownership around
Monument Lake, Wal-Mart, and on and on. Old wounds are festering, as memories of
town government recalls bring bitter feelings to the surface. Old feuds erupt,
with name-calling, accusations, and worse emerging.
Don’t you think it’s time to come together, putting all
this behind us for once and for all? It’s time for a community GROUP HUG! It’ll
do our children worlds of good to see us offering one another our hands and
hearts in friendship and accord. In these times of strife and greater trouble,
can’t we all just get along? The example we will set for our children alone
should make our efforts worth the while. Time’s a-wasting, folks. KUMBAYAH!
and God Bless.
Ruth Higgins

By Joe Kissell, Monument Police Chief
Could you become a victim of identity theft? According to the
Attorney General of Colorado, "On a national basis, identity theft is the
most frequent type of fraudulent activity reported. In 2002, 2,660 Colorado
residents notified the Federal Trade Commission that they were victims of
identity theft—more than double the number reported in the prior calendar
year."
If you are the victim of identity theft, contact the law
enforcement and file a report. In addition to filing the report, you should
contact your bank or financial credit card company with the fraud report from
the police or sheriff’s department. Contact your creditors and make them aware
of the situation. Finally, contact the fraud department of the three major
credit bureaus by phone or through the Internet. The three major bureaus are: Equifax,
www.equifax.com, (800) 525-6285; Experian,
www.experian.com (888) 397-3742; and TransUnion,
www.transunion.com (800) 680-7289.
When speaking with each of the credit bureaus, request a
"fraud alert" be placed on your file and request that creditors call
you before opening any new accounts or making changes to your current accounts
and also request a copy of your credit report.
In addition, complaints can be filed with the Federal Trade
Commission by phone (877-438-4338) or through the Internet (www.consumer.gov/idtheft
).
To reduce your chances of becoming a victim of identity
theft:
AARP volunteers will be available every Monday through Apr. 14
from noon until the last person leaves the Monument Town Hall to answer
questions and assist filers in completing their federal and state income tax
returns. Filers are asked to bring all forms (W-2, 1099, etc.) needed to
complete the returns, as well as a copy of last year’s (2001) tax return. For
more information, call Jim Taylor at 488-1317.
In 2001, nearly 6,000 people from Northern El Paso County
qualified for the federal Earned Income Tax Credit (EITC). However, nearly
one-third (2,000) of those were not aware they qualified, leaving a total of $3
million unclaimed. This equates to about $1,530 per person or $127.50 per month
that could have been used for food, housing, and other basic necessities.
Volunteer Income Tax Assistance (VITA) is a program designed
to assist low-income individuals and families with the preparation and filing of
their federal and state income tax returns. VITA volunteers will be available to
answer questions and assist filers in completing their income tax returns every
Thursday through March 28, from noon to 3 p.m. at Tri-Lakes Cares, 146 Jefferson
in Monument. Filers are asked to bring all 2002 forms (W-2, 1099, etc.) needed
to complete their return, plus a copy of last year’s tax return.
There is an annual income limit of $55,000 for the program.
In addition, Schedules C, E, F, or H; and returns that deal with the sale of a
home or moving expense, adoption credit, casualty or theft losses, foreign tax
credit, or Archer MSA deductions are beyond the scope of the VITA program.
Individuals with these more complicated tax returns are advised to seek the
services of a paid tax preparer. Military personnel and their families are
advised to consult with the trained volunteer at their military installation.
For more information, call Jim Taylor at 488-1317.
Since becoming a bookseller, I’ve been regularly surprised.
These bookish surprises have been threefold. The first has to do with the old
phrase, More books than time. I used to repeat it to myself in a casual way.
Since working here, it has acquired a poignant—no, a desperate—quality.
After being gone for three or four days, I am faced with a number of shiny new
dust jackets, and my top 10 list of "must reads" seems to shift each
week. For a book lover, it is daunting.
Second, there is definitely more bookselling hype than time.
Writing, editing, and printing are important but are only the beginning of a
book’s life. If real estate’s mantra is "location, location,
location," then a book’s mantra is "marketing, marketing,
marketing." The sheer volume of materials I receive from publishers is
amazing. Just by perusing catalogs, one knows what’s hot in our culture:
losing weight, relationships/advice, protecting our investments, and
get-rich-quick schemes. There are literally volumes of books in each category!
We receive catalogs of all sizes. Expensive catalogs and
those that look like throwaways. We have catalogs from the mega-presses and from
obscure ones like Drawn and Quarterly (graphic novels that have become the new
comic book), Naval Institute Press (all with a seafaring motif), and The
American University in Cairo Press (all things Egyptian and Middle Eastern). We
also subscribe to Publisher’s Weekly, a magazine/catalog for booksellers
crammed with articles about bookselling, publishing, hot authors, and the latest
books.
Finally, there are definitely more "amazing" books
published than there is time. This is different from more books to read than
time. However, what I might think is unworthy of the page it is printed on, you
might beg to differ. That said, I give you my first annual "ATAPI"
(Amazed That Anyone Published It) Award nominees for 2003:
Despite the description that "the preface will leave you
in no doubt as to the importance of this completely nonsensical book," I
still have my doubts. By the same author is the book Mobile Homes by Famous
Architects. Okay…
Combining social history and pop culture, and 241 pages about
Tupperware. There are illustrations.
Combining history and cooking, and 242 pages about ketchup,
or catsup, depending on your place of origin. And here I thought that the only
recipes that actually used ketchup were meatloaf and barbecue sauce.
All three of the Smithsonian nominees are a bit over 200
pages and priced exactly the same. I don’t have a clue as to what that means.
I probably have a bit more faith in recipes with bananas as their main
ingredient than I do for those with ketchup.
There will be an audience for this book in the 5 to
8-year-olds interested in body noises. But why would we encourage this passion
when absolutely none is necessary?
Basically anything for "dummies." It was clever and
useful in the beginning when these books covered computers. Now is there
anything that won’t be dummified?
I rest my case. I believe it would be a Herculean task to
find a topic, a subset of a topic, or a sub-subset of a topic that someone has
not published in book form. I’m sure it is a very good thing that no one has
sought my advice on what is worthy of being added to the body of printed
material. If they had, we might not have anything to laugh about when the
catalogs arrive, nor fodder for this column.