| |||||
|
|
|
Traffic Operations: How effectively the alternatives provide increased safety and mobility in the project area including I-25, frontage roads, local streets, and intersections at or near the interchange. | |
|
Project Cost: The construction cost of the alternatives relative to each other and the project budget. | |
|
Right of Way Needs: Potential impacts of the alternatives on properties including physical impacts, necessary acquisitions, and potential relocations. | |
|
Constructability: The ease of constructing the alternative based on potential impacts to traffic operations, safety, and property access along with the complexity and duration of the construction. | |
|
Environmental Resource Issues: Potential impacts of the alternatives on environmental resources including historical properties, threatened and endangered species habitat, wetlands, hazardous materials, and the visual character of the area. | |
|
Access: How effectively the alternatives accommodate access to the various residential areas and businesses in and around the project area and interchange. | |
|
Public and Agency Acceptability: How the public views the alternatives and how well the alternatives fit into the plans of the various local agencies. |
Traffic measurements made in May through December 2001 concluded that the I-25 on and off ramps and the intersection with the Struthers frontage road are at level of service (LOS) E or F morning and evening. LOS E represents unstable flow near capacity. LOS E often quickly changes to LOS F because of disturbances (road conditions, accidents, etc.) in traffic flow. LOS F represents the worst conditions with heavily congested flow and traffic demand exceeding capacity, characterized by stop-and-go waves, poor travel time, low comfort and convenience, and increased accident risk. About 7,400 vehicles per day in each direction were measured between I-25 and Jackson Creek Parkway.
All the designs include a new bridge over I-25 and three lanes in each direction on I-25, with longer lanes for the on and off ramps to provide more capacity than currently available for merging.
Design 1 includes a diamond interchange and the Struthers frontage road would be moved east. The entrances to Brookhart’s and the Total station would be moved farther from I-25 to improve intersection spacing.
Design 2 would eliminate left turns, and therefore left turn lanes, by using a partial cloverleaf configuration. The frontage road would be realigned to the east. This design has the highest cost for right-of-ways because it would require purchase and demolition of the Total station.
Design 3 uses a tight urban diamond interchange with two signal lights and a third signal light possible at the entrance to Brookhart’s if a road is built there to provide access to new development. The frontage road would be realigned, and the entrance to the Total station would be moved west. The ramps for this design appear shorter than in other designs.
Design 4 is like design 3, but would keep the existing frontage road and require a third signal light.
Design 5 is the most radical of the designs, as it employs roundabouts instead of signal lights. This design would keep the existing frontage road where it is. One guest commented that the roundabout at Lake Street in Colorado Springs was the scene of frequent accidents.
According to the summary display below, design 3 scored the highest marks, ‘good’ in Traffic Operations, Project Cost, Right-of-Way Needs, and Access; and ‘average;’ in Constructability and Environmental Resource Issues.
|
Pros and Cons |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
|
Traffic Operations |
Average |
Good |
Good |
Poor |
Average |
|
Project Cost |
Average |
Poor |
Good |
Good |
Average |
|
Right-of-Way Needs |
Average |
Poor |
Good |
Good |
Average |
|
Constructability |
Average |
Average |
Average |
Average |
Poor |
|
Environmental Resource Issues |
Good |
Average |
Average |
Poor |
Poor |
|
Access |
Average |
Good |
Good |
Average |
Good |
Note that Public and Agency Acceptability for the alternatives has not yet been determined.
The remaining schedule for the project is as follows:
|
Initial Alternative Screening and Alternative Refinement: March 2002 to May 2002 | |
|
Second Public Open House: June 2002 | |
|
Detailed Alternative Evaluation: May to July 2002 | |
|
Selection of Proposed Alternative: September 2002 | |
|
Third Public Open House: September 2002 | |
|
I-25 Environmental Process: Completed in Summer 2003 | |
|
Final Design: Following completion of environmental process | |
|
Construction: 2004 or beyond |
All of the materials from the open house including the configuration of the other four concept plans are posted at http://www.interstate25.com/ncdot/bapt/bapt21102.htm.
Comments on the project and the conceptual designs should be sent to Wilson and Company, 455 E. Pikes Peak Avenue, Suite 200, Colorado Springs, Colorado 80903. For more information, call Cheryl Everitt, Community Relations Manager, Wilson and Company, at 520-5800.

By John Heiser
At the February 2 meeting of the Northern El Paso County Coalition of Community Associations (NEPCO), residents raised a variety of concerns about the neighborhood impacts of the ongoing fiber optic upgrade of Adelphia’s cable network. Some residents reported damage to their yards and interruption of electric power and other utility services. Others objected to the size and number of utility boxes placed in the utility easements.
Adelphia general manager Mike Ross acknowledged that there have been problems but that they are being corrected. In particular, he said, “Contractors working in Woodmoor were fired.”
The Woodmoor Improvement Association (WIA) has asserted that through its protective covenants and architectural control committee, it has authority over construction work in the utility easements and common areas. Adelphia has largely ignored that claim. WIA has threatened legal action.
Despite reports that some Adelphia employees have told callers that WIA’s complaints have delayed implementation, Ross said, “Woodmoor is not holding it up.” Ross said the plan is to complete 400 to 600 homes at a time. Once the upgrade is complete in about ten weeks, the older utility boxes will be removed.
Ross outlined the new services that will be available when the upgrade is complete. These include 150 digital TV channels and high-speed Internet access. As part of the fiber optic Internet connection, utility boxes large enough to incorporate standby power supplies were needed at some locations.
Ross said rates for service will remain the same until May. After that rates will increase about $2 to match rates in Colorado Springs. According to Adelphia customer service, for those who do not wish to convert to digital cable, analog cable TV service stripped of premium channels will continue to be provided until 2006.
Some at the meeting asked when cable service would be extended to additional areas such as portions of Pleasant View south of Baptist Road. Randal Bailey, Adelphia’s Plant Supervisor for Monument, said, “We are looking at addressing every pocket.”
Sandra Mann, Adelphia’s director of local programming, discussed planned additional services including local sports and arts coverage, a public access channel, and local program origination. She said they have installed a studio and can provide some help in local production.
When contacted February 22, Bailey said he is talking with Paul Lambert, WIA Vice President, about having a meeting within the next few weeks to resolve WIA’s concerns. Bailey said, “We are going to sit down and work these problems out.” He also noted that the new cable services are now available in Gleneagle and are scheduled to be available in Woodmoor within the next three to four weeks.
NEPCO, the sponsor of the February 2 meeting, is a coordinating group for Tri-Lakes area property owners’ associations. NEPCO has been active in reviewing developments submitted to the county and has been a strong supporter of the joint fire protection study currently underway. For more information on NEPCO, contact membership co-chair Russ Broshous at 488-0074.
According to the 2000 Census, Colorado is the third fastest growing state in the country. Colorado’s communities are experiencing increased traffic congestion, loss of open space and farmland, and increasing housing prices. Colorado’s rate of growth and absence of growth management policies and practices threaten to undermine the quality of life Coloradans enjoy.
Shaping Livable Communities in Colorado is a daylong conference for citizens interested in policies, tools, and skills you can use to better implement growth management tools. Community leaders will address the different policies and tools available for communities to preserve open space, create affordable housing options, increase transportation options, and make better land-use decisions. Emphasis will be given to how citizens can go back and implement these policies and tools in their communities. The citizen conference will be held on Saturday, March 23, 2002, 9 am to 6 pm, in Denver at the Denver University Law Center, 7039 E 18th Ave.
This year’s conference is sponsored by Colorado Environmental Coalition, Colorado Public Interest Research Group (COPIRG) Sprawl Action Center, Livable Communities Support Center, Colorado Mobility Coalition, ColoRail, Sierra Club, the Colorado Affordable Housing Partnership and numerous local groups.
Cost: $20 in advance, $25 at the door. To Register on-line: http://www.sprawlaction.org, follow the links to the registration page.
For more information or to have a flyer mailed to you, contact Sam Sager, Colorado Environmental Coalition 303-534-7066 x218 sam@cecenviro.org , Michelle Kramer, COPIRG’s Sprawl Action Center 303-573-7474 x217, mkramer@copirg.org, or Rich McClintock, Livable Communities Support Center, 303-477-9985, rich@livablecenter.org.
By Russ Broshous, President, Tri-Lakes Parks and Recreation District
The Tri-Lakes Parks and Recreation District was approved by the El Paso County Board of County Commissioners for voter consideration in the election of November 2000. At that time, residents who objected to being a part of the district were permitted to ‘opt out’ -- that is, to voluntarily exclude themselves and their property from the district and any taxes it might be authorized to levy. 852 property owners availed themselves of that opportunity. At the November election, the voters approved formation of the district, but all funding issues failed.
At its February 19 meeting, the Tri-Rec Board of Directors approved placing three questions before the voters. The first two, Issues 5A and 5B, would authorize the construction and operation of a 43,000 square foot community center designed for all age groups in the community. It would include a competition-length pool and many other athletic and fitness amenities. Additionally, it would feature space with kitchen facilities for meetings of seniors and other groups, space for community service groups that wish to be headquartered there, and space for child care for community center users.
Finally, Issue 5C would authorize funds for the construction of a previously planned trail network, as well as the acquisition of Ben Lomond Mountain and other parcels as publicly accessible open space. The trails and open space will be maintained using Conservation Trust Funds and monies from other non-tax sources.
The literature the district recently distributed to residents as a paid insert in the February OCN edition spells out its policies for non-resident use of the facilities. While the trails and open space will be accessible to the general public, only tax-paying district residents will have free use of the community center, athletic fields, and other closed-use facilities. Those living outside the district’s service area will be permitted to use the facilities on a space available basis, and then only after the payment of a user fee. Those who live within the service area, but who have previously opted out of the district (the ‘opt-outs’), will not be permitted to use the facilities at all until they have petitioned to rejoin the district, been accepted by the board, and paid all fees and back taxes.
To date, nine previous ‘opt-outs’ have decided that now is the time to opt back in. The chief objection of these residents was that they didn’t think it was fair to have to pay taxes for a rec center, as well as the YMCA’s subscription and capital fees. With that objection removed, they want to rejoin the district before they owe any back taxes. The District Board of Directors voted on February 19 to process the petitions of the nine residents who have applied to rejoin. Any others interested in ‘opting in,’ should request a petition form from the Tri-Rec District at P.O. Box 2246, Monument, CO 80132, or send an email to info@tri-rec.com. The District will do the rest.
Two years ago, our community thought it had seen the last of the proposal presented by Transit Mix, Inc. for a concrete batch plant on North Washington Street. This company, however, sued the Town of Monument because the board of trustees did not approve its proposal. There are a number of reasons why this proposal was denied in the public hearings held two years ago, in particular, the developer was unwilling to adequately address the plant’s impact on traffic on Highway 105 and North Washington Street as well as some other matters identified at those public hearings. The town won the first round in this lawsuit in 2001, but Transit Mix would not let it drop and the next court date, which had been set for March 5, 2002, has been reset to June 25, 2002.
Oddly enough, new witnesses may be deposed in the next few weeks. They include Leon Tenney, former mayor of Monument, Betty Konarski, current mayor of Monument, John Heiser, Ernie Biggs, John Dominowski, and several others. It is not clear what new information these people can provide that is not already part of the transcribed public hearings when the people of our town spoke out for or against this Transit Mix Proposal. Curiously, the plaintiffs’ (Transit Mix and William Simpson) claim that my own website contains information relevant to the pleadings. I would be interested in knowing what that is all about.
For what reason does this company pursue the town and those residents of the town and Tri-Lakes who spoke against the Transit Mix proposal two years ago? The proposal was treated fairly during the process and was considered on its merits and demerits. During the public hearing process, the Transit Mix proposal was found by the Board of Trustees to be wanting. Could not Transit Mix Company come back with a new and improved proposal that could be acceptable both to the neighboring residents and the Town’s ordinances and comprehensive plan? Given the size of the Town and choice of many different locations, there possibly exists a suitable site.
In short, although the concrete batch plant issue has had a low profile for the past couple of years, it has never reached closure and is going to reappear in the forefront of the news again in the near future.
W.L. Morgan
I recently attended a joint meeting of the Monument Board of Trustees, Monument Planning Commission, and the Tri-View Board of Directors. The purpose of the meeting was to air Tri-View’s concerns about the Comprehensive Plan the Town of Monument is considering. Tri-View asserts the proposed Comprehensive Plan will cost them millions of dollars in lost tax revenue. I would like to point out to the Monument Board of Trustees that Tri-View’s Board of Directors was certainly not concerned about Monument’s loss of tax revenue when they decided to provide the Wal-Mart site with utilities even though the site is not in the district or the town. It is amazing to me Tri-View has the nerve to complain to Monument about a potential loss of tax revenue given their Wal-Mart decision. Concerned citizens spent many hours on the new Comprehensive Plan. I urge you to pass the Plan as proposed.
Dale R. Turner
Water is life in our climate. It is the difference between living well and barely surviving. In the Tri-Lakes area, most water districts must use deep wells to bring water up to the surface. Water from this source is usually non-renewable, since it is not recharged from rain or snow each year. Much concern has been expressed that the water in the Denver Basin Aquifers is being rapidly used up. 25 years from now will there be enough to go around? Therefore, water has become expensive to the producers and expensive to the residents. It should not be wasted.
Water systems consist of many parts. The first part is legal. Does the town or district have the legal ownership of the water beneath the ground and the water that runs off the surface? The amount of water per acre that potentially can be drawn from the aquifers each year is limited by the State of Colorado. The second part is soil mechanics and pumping capacity. The amount of water that can be physically pumped from any given location is limited by the permeability of the surrounding soil at that depth and the size of the pump. This draw-down volume may need to be allowed to recharge during any 24-hour period or the pump sucks dirt or air. This well drilling gets most of the attention of the public, but it is not most of the cost of the project. Most of the cost of any new well is the treatment facility to make the water potable for the public. Finally, the Town or district must distribute the water in pipes under pressure to each and every household for its use.
As our community grows, many of these water distribution lines have become old and spring leaks, spilling much of our precious treated water, and no one gets the use of it. It is just lost. Now some water losses can be expected since very few human engineered systems are 100% efficient. However, when these losses exceed over 1,000,000 gallons a month, that is too much.
The Town of Monument loses over one million gallons every month in leaky distribution lines in the mobile home park. This problem may have gone on for years, but due to the efficiency of our present Public Works Superintendent, Tom Wall, it was discovered last fall. Now to put this amount in perspective, the Town pumps approximately 7 million gallons per month in the winter and over 11 million gallons per month in the summer. This extra amount is due to people watering their lawns. Therefore, this amount is near 14% of the total during the low months and almost 10% during the critical months. Further, the Town of Monument recently spent about 1.8 million dollars drilling its latest well, located near Beacon Lite and 2nd Street.
At the February 19, 2002 Town Board of Trustees Meeting, a motion was passed that requires the owner of the mobile home park to fix the leaky distribution system within sixty days to a point that the total water use of the mobile home park is 600,000 gallons or less per month. If the problem is not fixed within sixty days, the town will shut off the water to the 300 residents at the mobile home park.
If the cost of fixing the water distribution lines in the mobile home park is $200,000 and if the amount of water being lost is what is pumped from one of the Town’s well, then we can cost avoid the next well by fixing the distribution lines to eliminate this 1.0 million gallon per month loss for one-tenth of the price. Why not do it?
Unfortunately, this solution has legal difficulties. These water distribution lines are owned by a private party, which rents the spaces at the mobile home park. The Town of Monument owns up to a certain point and its responsibilities end. But can we leave at that? I think that the Town spending 1.8 million dollars so water can be dumped into the ground by leaky pipes is not right. Certainly, the rest of the Town does not want to spend this money and the residents and owner of the mobile home park do not want to buy this amount of water at $6.00 per 1,000 gallons. Some middle ground is needed such that the lines are fixed and the costs are pro-rated. If the owner does not have the money, the Town as a public service for the nearly 300 residents in the mobile home park could fix the lines and assess over a 10-year period the recoupment of this from the mobile home park owner. The main advantage to the Town as a whole is to cost avoid the money needed to produce 1 million gallons a month.
Finally, though this discussion is about the latest water leak in one area, this situation of old, leaky pipes could be in Palmer Lake, Woodmoor, or Gleneagle. Should these residents pay 10 times the price of fixing leaky lines in constructing new wells? These questions should be addressed before the knee-jerk reaction of drilling a new well. These districts may want to study the problem via the Water Master Plan before spending the money on new wells as the Town of Monument has.
Leon W. Tenney
By Joe Kissell, Chief, Monument Police Department
At a ceremony on the 4th of February, in front of the Board of Trustees, Officer Steve Burk of the Police Department received a promotion to the rank of Sergeant. Sergeant Burk is a 7½-year veteran with the Police Department, starting his employment with the Town of Monument in September of 1994.
Sergeant Burk was selected for the promotion after successfully completing several phases of a promotion process that included submitting a letter stating why he should be considered for the promotion along with a resume. The process also included appearing before an oral board made up of two lieutenants, one from the El Paso County Sheriff’s Office and one from the Colorado Springs Police Department, along with citizen/business owner Tim Watkins from Balanced Rock Bike and Ski.
The candidates were also required to answer questions designed to address their thoughts on how the Police Department should look to future needs of the community. Finally, the candidates completed an interview with the Chief. Sergeant Burk’s responses to the questions, the review boards and his record with the Police Department placed him as the top candidate for the promotion.
The other officers applying for the position also did well supporting the fact the community can be proud of the Police Department and the people wearing the badge. Our focus is and will continue to be preservation of citizen rights and law enforcement designed to improve the quality of life we enjoy here in the Tri-Lakes area.
Our thanks to the El Paso County Sheriff’s Office, the Colorado Springs Police Department and Mr. Tim Watkins for taking time to help us select our new Sergeant.
Provided by Deputy Rick Frady, Crime Prevention Unit, El Paso County Sheriff’s Department
The Internal Revenue Service (IRS) has issued an alert concerning a fraudulent scam being conducted by e-mail. Some taxpayers have received e-mail from a non-IRS source indicating that the taxpayer is under audit and needs to complete a questionnaire within 48 hours to avoid the assessment of penalties. The e-mail refers to an “e-audit” and references IRS Form 1040. The taxpayer is asked for social security number, bank account numbers and other confidential information.
The IRS does not conduct “e-audits” nor does it notify taxpayers of a pending audit by e-mail. This e-mail is not from the IRS. Do not provide the requested information. This may be an identity-theft attempt. If you receive e-mail of this nature, please contact the IRS office in your area.
By Julie Lokken, Palmer Lake Volunteer Fire Department
Tri-Lakes area band Jackdaddy held a concert at Pinecrest Event Center on February 22 to benefit the Tri-Lakes area fire departments. The members of Jackdaddy, a popular local band, wanted to do something special in tribute to the dedication of the area fire departments. Brian Jack, Lee Williams, Kane Cotton, and Mitch Spirer thought that after the support shown for the New York fire departments by the Tri-Lakes area, it would be nice to show support for the local fire departments.
Approximately 200 people attended the concert and enjoyed four hours of excellent music and great community fellowship. With the community sponsorship from Pinecrest Event Center, The Cork and Bottle, Monument Pizza, Tri-Lakes Printing, and the Tri-Lakes Tribune, the band was hoping to net at least $200 for each fire department. Singer Brian Jack said he thought they had reached and possibly exceeded their goal and added, “Jackdaddy would like to thank everyone who helped with and attended the concert. We felt it was important at this time to show our support for the firefighters of our area and thank them for all they do for the Tri-Lakes area.”
The Woodmoor-Monument Fire Protection District, Tri-Lakes Fire Protection District and the Palmer Lake Volunteer Fire Department will be the beneficiaries of the net proceeds. The money will be used to help purchase needed equipment.

“Many thanks to all the fine teens, business owners, and civic groups who gave of their time, service, and energy to help raise money for the purchase of the MSA 4000 infrared viewing device. Without the help of our community minded citizens the fundraiser would never have been successful. We have a lot of wonderful people in the Tri-Lakes area.” said Karen Evans, fundraiser coordinator and owner of A Chick & A Windshield.
Jil Tilitz, manager of the Jackson Creek King Soopers, and Russ Novotney, manager of the Safeway store in Monument, opened their arms in support of the fundraising drive allowing the stores to be used for donation centers on Saturdays.
Palmer Lake Fire Department made a cash donation. Chief Jensen at the Tri-Lakes Fire Department will be submitting a grant request for $5000.00 to Mountain View Electric Round Up Fund. The grant money will be applied toward the purchase of the camera. Marshall Blake and Chief Youtsey of the Woodmoor/Monument Fire Department contributed postage for several mailings to business owners. All three of the fire departments dedicated trucks and firefighters to visit with the community on the four Saturdays during the fundraiser. They gave tours of the fire trucks and answered questions about the infrared camera. Some families took photos with the trucks and firefighters.
Jim Lipper of the Pikes Peak Fire Buffs brought his antique fire truck to King Soopers to share with the community for three Saturdays during the fundraiser. The truck had last been in service in Central City, CO. It was originally owned by the Boulder County Rural Fire Protection District and was first placed in service there in 1959. Jim Lipper purchased the truck and displays it in memory of his late uncle, Martin Lipper, who died in the line of duty on March 10th, 1941 fighting the Strand Theatre fire that took the lives of thirteen fire fighters in Brockton, Massachusetts. “We very much appreciate Jim’s support and caring for this community. Jim helped staff tables and brought the fire truck down even when it was snowing. He is a very special man” said Karen Evans, fundraiser coordinator.
Chief Crenshaw, the former fire chief of Woodmoor-Monument Fire Department, died during the drive. Several of his friends made donations in lieu of flowers to the Have A Heart; Save A Life fundraising drive at the request of his family.
Darlah Kapusta of ComSer-Co, Inc. in Palmer Lake donated the printing of flyers and posters for the drive.
The Women Business Owners & Managers club of Tri-Lakes supported the effort with many of the members staffing tables at the grocery stores. Mary Feldmann and Karen Evans of A Chick & A Windshield, Bonnie Biggs of Lake of the Rockies and Colorado Heights Campgrounds, Cheryl Rogers of Chyann’s Pet Care, Linda Cook of Liberty Heights, Camilla Mottl of Woodmoor Improvement Association, Mary Russelavag of the Town of Monument, Maureen Haigh and Tanya McSwan of Adelphia, and Margo Gasta of Nutrition for Life all helped out by taking two hour shifts. Some ladies took several shifts to supply the needed coverage.
The Monument Hill Sertoma Club assisted the effort with Mike Wicklund staffing a booth and Max Williams organizing the Serteens to staff booths. The following Serteens donated their time and service: David Motta, Kelly Bryant, Blair Luber, Ryan June, Matt Miller, Andrew Shahan, Philip Taylor, Mike and Matt Ziemke, David Rieseling, Katie Shahan, Jessica Byrd, and Rachel Green.
Other students from Lewis-Palmer High donated their time to fulfill a community service requirement of a civics class. Mr. O’Connor has his students participate in community service each year as part of their studies. Mike Schreier, Ian Irish, and Ian Smith all chose to staff tables as part of their class requirement. Lewis-Palmer Middle School got involved by placing a donation jug at their school.
The Kiwanis club donated several hundred of their annual historic calendars to give away to donors at the grocery stores. Chuck Hardy helped staff a booth as well, sharing smiles and handshakes with those who entered the store.
The following people gave of their time and service by distributing, checking, and returning collection canisters: Dee Bates of Stone Mountain Trading Post, Cheryl Rogers of Chyann’s Pet Care, Cathy & Woody Woodworth of High Country Feed, The Tri-Lakes Fire Department, Ian Irish, and Jim Crawley.
The drive was successful in raising $7,313.00. The desired goal was $15,000.00. Although the $15,000.00 goal was not met, the Woodmoor-Monument Fire Department made the decision to purchase the infrared camera. It is now being employed on all structure fire calls. “This particular piece of equipment is so vital we felt we really needed to have it. Since we were so accustomed to using the previous device, we really felt the loss not having the benefit of this camera,” Chief Youtsey said. He is hopeful the grant from Mountain View Electric will be made through cooperative efforts with the Tri-Lakes Fire Protection District. The 2002 budget for new equipment will help make up the shortfall.
Donations to the Woodmoor-Monument Fire Protection District can still be made and are gratefully accepted to help defray the cost of the infrared camera. “We had several people donate $100.00. It was a special feeling to reach into the donation buckets at the end of the day and find sizeable checks and one hundred dollar bills.” said Karen Evans. “People who took the time to stop and ask questions learned about the device and how it would be used. Once they understood what we were doing and why, they were very supportive of our efforts and made generous donations,” said Karen. “We even had a recording artist stop and visit. He sent us several of his CD’s in support of our efforts. We will be giving these to our top donors as a thank you for their generosity.” “If there’s one thing I’ve learned from this fundraiser,” said Karen, “It’s this: Not everyone can give a lot of money, but if we all give a little we can accomplish big goals. A little from a lot goes a long way.”
By Lisa Black
The Palmer Divide Quiltmakers and the Monument Hill Branch Library will celebrate National Quilting Day on Sunday, March 17 at the library. National Quilting Day was established in 1992 through the efforts of the National Quilting Association. It has become an annual event that is celebrated by quilters all over the world, and the Palmer Divide Quiltmakers hope to make it an annual celebration here in Monument.
The main idea of the day is to celebrate the pleasure of quilting in some way by sharing quilting knowledge and talents with others. There are as many different types of activities on National Quilting Day as there are different types of quilting groups. The plans range from small to large, from simple to complex. Some quilting bees may simply set aside the day to do what they enjoy doing most - working on their current quilting project. Sometimes quilt guilds and quilt shops sponsor the equivalent of quilt-a-thons to make as many quilts as possible in one day. The quilts will be given to various groups, individuals, and organizations that need them for the work they do throughout the community. The quilts are made for those in need whether that is a hospital crisis nursery, some type of shelter, or someone in the community who needs a little extra comforting. Many groups also sponsor quilt shows, classes, and demonstrations.
The Palmer Divide Quiltmakers and Monument Hill Branch library have a fun afternoon of learning about quilting planned for Sunday, March 17 at the library in the Woodmoor Center on Lake Woodmoor Drive. There will be quilting demonstrations from 1 pm to 3 pm. Members of the guild will be demonstrating hand quilting and hand piecing for all ages. In addition, there are several activities planned for children. There will be a storyteller at 1:30 pm, a class for preschoolers to make a “paper quilt” at 2 pm, and a children’s hand quilting class at 2:30 pm. The older children in the hand quilting class will be working with needle, thread, and fabric. The grand finale for the afternoon will be a lecture by Bobbie Aug at 3:30 pm. Bobbie is a wonderful and knowledgeable speaker. She is a quilt historian, a quilt book author, and a certified quilt appraiser. Bobbie has served three terms as President of the Colorado Quilting Council. In addition to this day of quilting celebration, Palmer Divide Quiltmakers will have a quilt show on exhibit at the library March 11 through 24.
Palmer Divide Quiltmakers is a new quilt guild that started in the area early in 2001. PDQ is a charter group of the National Quilting Association. The guild has about 65 members that meet once a month at the Church of Woodmoor. Members come from Castle Rock to Colorado Springs, from Palmer Lake to Falcon, and all in between. Palmer Divide Quiltmakers is devoted to learning more about the art of quilting and to encourage an appreciation of the art by providing educational meetings, sharing ideas and information, and the promotion of a variety of activities. Please stop in the library to enjoy the beautiful quilt exhibit and come help celebrate National Quilting Day. Everyone is welcome and we hope to see you there!

By Sue Buell
Ahh, Saturday. February 9 – what a day to remember: donated space at Pinecrest Event Center; donated instruction of five exercise classes; donated food and beverages by King Soopers and Safeway; five high schoolers helped and got their community service time for civics class; Stretching, Inc. donated a percentage of their merchandise sales for the day; students of the Colorado Institute of Massage Therapy donated sports massages; Paula Primavera, Patti Brickell, Cyndee Henson, Carol Coopman, Judy Barnes, Roth Hyland, and Sue Buell volunteered their time; and Bob Collins provided a sound system.
Then…Great WIND and then SNOW and MORE WIND and COLD! People stayed safe at home except for the previously mentioned hardy and courageous souls and twenty local exercise dynamos! The volunteers sold merchandise, food, and accepted donations and the event cleared $475 after all expenses were paid. They also heard requests to PLEASE repeat this event in the summer. Thanks to all who supported this fundraiser!
The April 2 Monument municipal election will fill five of the six positions on the Monument Board of Trustees. OCN attempted to contact all the candidates that had declared their intention to run for Monument trustee. We gave each candidate a list of questions. Below are the responses received by our deadline February 22. The candidates responses are listed alphabetically: Byron Glenn, W. Lowell Morgan, Christopher Perry, Kristi Schutz, and Doug Warner.
Byron Glenn
1. How long have you lived in Monument
I moved to the Jackson Creek community of Monument in April 1999.
2. Tell us about your background: education, occupation, where you have lived before, prior jobs and previous participation in the community.
Born and raised in San Diego, CA; graduated from San Diego State University with a BS Degree in Civil Engineering; moved to Las Vegas, NV in 1993; moved to Colorado Springs in 1996. I was a retail clerk through high school and college and have been a civil engineer since. I am a licensed Professional Engineer in the States of Colorado, California and Nevada. I am a current member of the Town of Monument Board of Trustees, Vice President of the Baptist Road Rural Transportation Authority (BRRTA), serve on the Pikes Peak Regional Building Commission, the Monument Economic Development Committee, and I previously served on the Planning Commission.
3. What is your view of the proposed Town Comprehensive Plan?
In my opinion, the Comprehensive Plan, in its current state, is incomplete. The plan needs to reference and discuss the needs and desires of the Districts within the Town of Monument’s corporate limits, and should reference requirements outlined in the Intergovernmental Agreements between these Districts and the Town. The Districts within the Town include Triview Metro, Monument Sanitation, Forest Lakes Metro, Woodmoor Sanitation, Tri-Lakes and Woodmoor-Monument Fire Protection, Tri-Rec, and School District 38. The Comprehensive Plan should outline the development needs required within these Districts for estimates of future revenue generation, which allow the Districts to fund the required services. I believe the plan should be completed with the cooperation and coordination of these Special Districts, before adoption by the Planning Commission. The plan also needs to revise future land uses around Monument Lake, Highway 105 and the Washington Street area, and Jackson Creek. Owners of the vacant land should also have the ability to give input on what they would recognize as feasible zoning for their property. Recreational issues such as parks, ball fields, trails and recreational centers also need to be better outlined and addressed. One thing we all need to remember, at this time (future State legislation may change this) the Comprehensive Plan is just a land use plan and guide for future rezoning of property, should a property owner request a zone change. The land within Monument is already zoned, with a vast majority of land zoned within a Planned Zone such as a Planned Commercial District (PCD) and Planned Industrial District (PID). These zones are similar to a PUD zoning, which requires extensive land plan submittals for review prior to approval. Commercial development is a vital necessity for generating revenue within the Town. This revenue is then utilized to pay for future water supplies, sanitary sewage collection and treatment facilities, drainage, roads, parks, police and fire protection. Without good and well planned commercial development, property taxes may increase to offset the cost of these services.
4. Do you think ‘big box’ (>100,000 square feet) retail stores should be accommodated by the comprehensive plan?
Again, the Comprehensive Plan is not a zoning document and, therefore, does not designate a building footprint size height, or setback requirements. These items are all outlined in the approved zoning requirements of the property. As far as the potential development of these types of retail stores, I believe the Town should keep its options open. There are many things that we all need to consider as a development site plan or zone change request is submitted to the Town for review and approval, including transportation issues around the proposed site, landscape buffers, lighting, architecture and building height. As a Town, we need to ask questions like: How will this proposed development benefit or potentially hurt the Town? What are the property rights of the landowner and what do the zoning regulations and land use laws say about the proposed development? There is really no easy ‘yes’ or ‘no’ answer; each application needs to be thoroughly reviewed and a decision has to be made based upon its individual merit.
5. What role do you think Tri-Lakes residents who live outside the town limits should have in determining the content of the comprehensive plan?
The Town of Monument is the commercial hub of the Tri-Lakes area. I believe that everyone impacted by the decisions of the Town should have the right to voice opinions and concerns regarding any issue that may impact their life, health or finances. I also believe that the residents of the Town, and the individuals who own land within the Town and pay property taxes to the Town, have a greater right and, therefore, a greater responsibility to voice their desires. It is these people whose property tax dollars help to pay for required services the Town provides.
6. What do you see as the most compelling issue, at this time, for the Board of Trustees?
I know there will be many compelling and important issues through the next year, but at this time I believe that the issues at hand include the immediate appointment of a Town Treasurer, and the development and implementation of a balanced budget for the year 2002. Land use applications are always important issues that need to be handled in an unbiased, thoughtful and legal fashion. The Comprehensive Plan is an important issue facing the Town, however, it will be adopted by the Planning Commission with only an endorsement from the Board.
7. What would you contribute to the Board of Trustees?
As a current member of the Board, I have learned a great deal regarding the Town and its daily operations. I have learned not only how the Town functions, but also how the Special Districts in the area work. I know how the 2002 budget was derived and potential changes it may have to undergo in the next few months. I am familiar with the current status of all capital improvement projects and various litigations. As a professional civil engineer, I have extensive experience with zoning, land planning and development, infrastructure requirements, construction management and contract administration. Most importantly, however, I vote my conscience. I am not influenced by any individual or special interest group. I vote on the facts and weigh those facts with what I believe is best for the Town of Monument and its residents.
8. What is your vision for the future of Monument?
With the completion of the Comprehensive Plan, Monument Dam, Beacon Lite Road, Second Street, and with the I-25 interchanges planned in the near future, I see Monument as becoming a very viable town with a diverse economy, population and land use. I see children growing up and staying in the area, working and living in a very attractive and sound community.
9. What else do you want the readers to know about you?
I am not a politician, but an average person with a family to support and a mortgage payment. I want the best for my family and a future for my children. Since I have been on the Board of Trustees, I have discovered that no issue is trivial. Each issue needs to be resolved with factual information and sincere thought.
W. Lowell Morgan
1. Where in Monument do you live and how long have you lived in Monument?
I live on Jefferson Street in the old part of the Town of Monument and have the good fortune of having a short commute to my office on Washington Street. I moved to the Tri-Lakes area from Castle Rock in 1988 and have lived in the Town itself for four years.
2. Tell us about your background: education, occupation, where you have lived before, prior jobs, and previous participation in the community.
I have B.S. degrees in physics and in engineering and a Ph. D. in physics. I have been a professional physicist since 1968. I moved to Boulder, Colorado from Ann Arbor, Michigan in March 1976 to work at an astrophysics institute there. I then was a nuclear weapons physicist at a national lab in Livermore, California between 1979 and 1986 before coming back to Boulder and then to Castle Rock and finally to Monument, where I started my own applied physics company in 1988. I have been involved in school district advisory committees for a number of years and was chair of the District Accountability Advisory Committee for four years. I have previously been on the public works committee and planning commission as well as being a Trustee of the Town of Monument.
3. What is your vision for the future of Monument?
I envision the future Town of Monument as comprising a vibrant Historic District plus, in the newer areas under development, a mix of residential, retail, and office & light industrial some of which would, hopefully, be high technology. It would be wonderful to have businesses in Monument that would pay employees a wage such that they could also live in Monument. Office & light industrial would do that; retail will not. Many people move to this area because of its scenic beauty and ready access to outside activities. I would work at not only preserving those features of this area, but also expanding access to trails and parks.
4. What is your view of the proposed Town Comprehensive Plan?
As a high tech entrepreneur I know the value of long term planning. The Town Comprehensive Plan will eventually be a valuable document. In its present very rough draft form it serves to focus discussion but is far from being a polished complete and final document.
5. Do you think ‘big box’ (>100,000 square feet) retail stores should be accommodated by the comprehensive plan?
I have mixed feelings about “big box” stores. I’m aware of their popularity but I’m also aware that every major chain has a store within a 15-minute drive of here. What needs to be decided upon is whether the residents of the town and our neighbors, who may not be within the town limits, want parts of Monument, e.g. Baptist Road or the future Jackson Creek Parkway or Highway 105, to have the look and feel of North Academy Boulevard in Colorado Springs. That’s not an easy decision and, once made, it’s an irreversible decision. Such developments will change the character of this area for the remainder of our lifetimes. There is a mythology that we frequently hear, which is clearly self-serving for certain people, that small towns cannot survive financially without embracing big box retail stores. This is more disinformation and hyperbole than truth. I would work to sort out the truth from the myth and to help plan a financially viable future for the Town of Monument.
6. What role do you think Tri-Lakes residents who live outside the town limits should have in determining the content of the comprehensive plan?
Since most people in the Tri-Lakes area live outside the Town limits but are, nevertheless, affected greatly by decisions made by Town government, their voices should be heard and listened to.
7. What do you see as the most compelling issue for the Board of Trustees?
The most important role played by the Board of Trustees is to try to promote a vision of the future of the Town that is amenable to those of us who plan on calling Monument home for years and decades to come. This involves not only tools like the Comprehensive Plan but ensuring that Town ordinances, which have evolved over the years, are adhered to in development, water usage, and so on.
8. What would you contribute as a member of the Board of Trustees?
I would view my role as an alternative voice to that of the Mayor, who is herself a commercial realtor, and her patrons who may have a vision for the future of Monument that is at odds with that of many town residents, especially newer town residents, who have come here to escape places like the Briargate area of Colorado Springs. I think many people would like to have such voices on the Board of Trustees but are themselves, understandably, reluctant to run for election. It takes vast amounts of time and as a candidate or public official one is always fair game for the slander, innuendo, and character assassination that have become the norm in politics at all levels. Nevertheless, I believe that people want representatives for their points of view.
9. What else do you want the readers to know about you?
My life and interests are documented on my personal Web log (known as a Blog in the Internet community) at www.leptonic.com. I am listed in the phone book and my email address is morgan@kinema.com.
Christopher Perry
1. Where in Monument do you live and how long have you lived in Monument?
My wife and I chose to move to the John Laing Community off Old Denver Highway 2 years ago.
2. Tell us about your background: education, occupation, where you have lived before, prior jobs, and previous participation in the community.
I have a BA in Psychology from the University of New Hampshire (UNH). I attended NY Medical College for a MPH in Epidemiology until I moved to Colorado. Health Management Systems (HMS), a subsidiary of Anthem, Inc, recruited me to Colorado in 1998. I am currently a Business Analyst at HMS. I have been actively involved in my community since High School. At UNH I was a member of Durham Ambulance Corps, a founding member of UNH Search and Rescue and a Co-Coordinator of Cool-Aid, a crisis intervention hotline. After college, I continued community involvement as a volunteer Firefighter and EMT in NY and with Black Forest Fire/Rescue here in Colorado. In October 2001 I was appointed the Board of Trustees to fill a seat created by the recall election.
3. What is your vision for the future of Monument?
I see Monument as the ideal family community with a good mix of residential, business, retail, office space, and green space. The small town charm of Monument will be preserved in our neighborhoods and that will make this a premier community in southern Colorado.
4. What is your view of the proposed Town Comprehensive Plan?
I feel that this advisory document is critical to the future of the town and the planning process. As it currently stands, in its draft stage, it is a good first draft. There are some items that need to be looked at again, and compromises will need to be made. Overall I commend the effort and I look forward to the completion of the process. I think the biggest issue land owners need to understand is that the plan, in its current format cannot change zoning. Unless there is new legislation passed, this is a guide to help us evaluate new zoning change requests and possibly streamline development proposals that meet the plan’s criteria. It is only through the cooperation of all parties involved that we can develop a comprehensive plan that will work for everyone.
5. Do you think ‘big box’ (>100,000 square feet) retail stores should be accommodated by the comprehensive plan?
I feel that ignoring the ‘big box’ retail concept would be a mistake due to the current zoning in Regency Park (Jackson Creek) and what is perceived as the intent of the landowners and developers in that area. As this is an advisory document, it does not guarantee that ‘big box’ retail can come to town nor does it keep us from fighting a development request that is not in the town’s best interest. We need to look beyond today and acknowledge that there may be some retail concepts that may be desirable in the future. That is what the Comprehensive Plan is designed to do, look beyond today and help us guide the future.
6. What role do you think Tri-Lakes residents who live outside the town limits should have in determining the content of the comprehensive plan?
Clearly we cannot write a Comprehensive Plan without our neighbors who live outside the town limits. I feel that their input is critical in producing an accurate and livable plan that we can all follow. While I think areas outside the Town should be consulted in the development of the plan, it is the Monument residents, businesses and landowners that should have the main role in developing the content of our Comprehensive Plan.
7. What do you see as the most compelling issue for the Board of Trustees?
We need to find ways of attracting quality commercial developments that will enhance the Town and its financial position. Developments that stress our water supply, damage our roads, and pollute our environment are not a good decision for the town. I hope the newly formed Economic Development Council will find ways that we can attract these new businesses and retain existing business that we value so much. Monument will not survive without growth, but that growth can be controlled so that it enhances our community. I want Monument to be a place where I would want to live 10 and 20 years in the future.
8. What would you contribute as a member of the Board of Trustees?
I will continue to provide open communication and provide the “out of the box” thinking that is needed in 21st century management. I will make decisions that are the best for this town and its residents, businesses and landowners.
9. What else do you want the readers to know about you?
I am honored to serve as your Trustee and look forward to continuing my service to this community. My only special interest is making this a community I want to live in 10 years down the road and beyond. Please visit my new website for additional election and position information at www.christopher-perry.com
Kristi Schutz
1. Where in Monument do you live and how long have you lived in Monument?
I live, along with my husband and four children, in the West Oak Ridge subdivision near Mitchell Ave. and Mt Herman Rd. We have been Monument residents since 1987.
2. Tell us about your background: education, occupation, where you have lived before, prior jobs, and previous participation in the community.
I was born and raised in Minnesota. I am a high school graduate. My husband and I have four children. I enjoy being a stay at home mom/homemaker. Over the years, I have served in a number of volunteer roles. I have enjoyed room parent parties, monitoring lunchrooms and classroom activities. I first became involved in Monument politics when I was appointed to the public works committee. I then enjoyed serving on the Board of Trustees for a number of years. I have served on the Monument Cemetery Board, Baptist Road Rural Transportation Authority (which deals with the issues of traffic and safety on Baptist Road) and also on the Board of Adjustments, which addresses zoning issues.
3. What is your vision for the future of Monument?
This is my vision of Monument: a small town atmosphere, an arts centered business district, family neighborhoods, a sense of safety, and great schools. In our land use decisions, we need to keep these values in mind. It is important that we maintain a modern and well-staffed police force. Town officials need to work closely with school administrators to ensure that the community maintains its excellence in education. We need to carefully protect our limited water resources, and ensure that our road system is safe and well planned. Road safety will continue to be a critical issue along Baptist Road, particularly at the I-25 intersection. Monument Lake is an asset that must be preserved and at the same time can provide a valuable recreation opportunity for our town. We need to promote our existing business, while attracting new business activity that provides a solid tax base while not compromising those basic ideals that make our community unique.
4. What is your view of the proposed Town Comprehensive Plan?
I feel the plan needs some more work. I’m concerned about the extent and location of “Planned Industrial” zones adjacent to residential areas. For example, the proposed draft of the plan contemplates the location of “Planned Industrial” directly adjacent to the John Laing and Santa Fe Subdivisions. That is not good planning. In addition, there is too much “Planned Industrial along type I-25 corridor. This is the gateway to Monument and the surrounding communities. We need uses that are consistent with the small town feel of the area, not intensive industrial uses. Most of us have chosen to live in Monument to enjoy the small town atmosphere. I think we need to be mindful of that when working with the comprehensive plan.
5. Do you think ‘big box’ (>100,000 square feet) retail stores should be accommodated by the comprehensive plan?
We need to plan for a solid tax base, which includes viable commercial activities. At the same time, I believe there are many alternatives to big box type stores.
6. What role do you think Tri-Lakes residents who live outside the town limits should have in determining the content of the comprehensive plan?
Residents should clearly have the most input in the Town’s comprehensive plan. That is a privilege of living in Monument. However, we all shop at the same stores, attend the same schools, drive the same roads. Therefore, since the plan effects the greater community, our neighbors should also have a voice in the process.
7. What do you see as the most compelling issue for the Board of Trustees?
Clearly, the comprehensive plan is critical. We have an opportunity to shape our future growth. Water will always be concern. Making sure we can safely travel in and out of town continues to be a challenge; Baptist Road is an immediate concern. We need to work at keeping a balanced budget.
8. What would you contribute as a member of the Board of Trustees?
I can contribute the experience of fifteen years of living in Monument. I am familiar with the D-38 schools, as all of our children have been educated here. The knowledge of being on past boards and committees gives me some insight to the strengths and weaknesses of the Town.
9. What else do you want the readers to know about you?
I would be proud to represent the residents of Monument as a Trustee. I have been honored to participate in Town government in the past. In my past service I have always tried to consider the best interest of the community. These convictions have lead me to vote against proposed developments such as concrete batch plants and RV storage and repair. At the same time, I voted for a number of ordinances that promoted our local businesses and protected our limited resources. If elected to the Board of Trustees, I would pursue the same objectives in the future.
Doug Warner
1. Where in Monument do you live and how long have you lived in Monument?
I have lived in the Jackson Creek subdivision since November of 1999.
2. Tell us about your background: education, occupation, where you have lived before, prior jobs, and previous participation in the community.
I attended the University of Kansas from 1976 to 1979. My major of study was physical education. I was born in a small town in south central Missouri and grew up in Lawrence, Kansas. I currently am a self-employed business owner. Prior to that as General Manager for 24 Hour Fitness operating a 1.5 million dollar annual budget. Currently I am a member of the Parks and Landscape Committee.
3. What is your vision for the future of Monument?
To preserve historical Monument while maintaining responsible growth.
4. What is your view of the proposed Town Comprehensive Plan?
The current proposal is under review and I would like the opportunity to hear citizen feedback before making any decisions.
5. Do you think ‘big box’ (>100,000 square feet) retail stores should be accommodated by the comprehensive plan?
All future stores should comply with Monuments master plan.
6. What role do you think Tri-Lakes residents who live outside the town limits should have in determining the content of the comprehensive plan?
Anyone being affected by change should get a chance to be heard and with the information presented to the board logical decisions can be made.
7. What do you see as the most compelling issue for the Board of Trustees?
Developing a consensus that works for the betterment of Monument and it’s citizens.
8. What would you contribute as a member of the Board of Trustees?
An open mind capable of assessing information and making quality decisions.
9. What else do you want the readers to know about you?
I am from a small town for the preservation of a small town...recognizing the need for responsible growth.
| March 4 - Close of Registration | |
| March 8-18 - Clerk to mail ballots to registered voters | |
| March 13 - Last day to file notice with clerk of intent to run as a write-in candidate | |
| April 2 - Election Day |
To be counted, ballots must be received no later than 7 pm. Ballots may be cast in person at the clerk’s office in the town hall, 166 2nd St., or hand-delivered to the town hall. They cannot be counted, however, if they are placed in an incorrect receptacle at the town hall (e.g., mistakenly dropped into the slot for utility bills).
Questions? Call town hall at 481-2954
By Judith Pettibone
Our tent was about to be torn apart by a freak afternoon windstorm in Yosemite National Park. We grabbed our books and made for the car. I had just begun Trinity by Leon Uris and my husband said, “Why don’t you read to me?”
And so began our reading aloud adventure that has now spanned 28 years. People are amazed when I tell them we regularly read aloud together. Protestations of How do you have the time? or Isn’t it awfully slow? usually follow. It does take time, but it is a great way to slow down a bit and discuss ideas, characters and even preposterous plot lines. And it makes the hours of a road trip fly by. Reading as a couple has been most rewarding, and our entire family remembers fondly the books we have read together through the years.
What do we read? Almost anything. Since we began with Trinity, we’ve never been intimidated by length. In fact, we two have read aloud all four Harry Potter books. We love a yarn but have liked quiet stories, too. We have a few “rules” … we do not continue with a book that only one of us likes. We avoid sagas with numerous characters with difficult last names like those in Shogun or Michener’s Poland (too tough to remember). And we aren’t allowed to fall asleep when the other is reading.
Suggestions for reading aloud:
Partner Reads:
Tales:
Clive Cussler’s Dirk Pitt series has given us the best eye rolls. We always say we won’t read another one, but we always do.
Selected Michener, all of Uris, and Clavell’s Nobel House
Character rich novels:
Any book by Morris West, Tom Wolfe and Bette Bao Lord
New Reads:
Ella Minnow Pea by Mark Dunn: Hint: a fascinating and fun read but it might help to have the 20 volume unabridged Oxford Dictionary on hand in the beginning J.
Balzac and The Little Chinese Seamstress by Dai Sijai: a fascinating peek at Maoist China through the eyes of two teen-age boys taken into a ‘reeducation’ facility.
Family Reads
Tales:
Harry Potter books by J.K. Rowling
Redwall Series by Brian Jacques
Any book by Roald Dahl
The Narnia Series by C.S. Lewis
The Dark is Rising Series by Susan Cooper
Character rich novels:
Out of the Dust (a young teen’s journal about the Dust Bowl of the ‘30’s … spellbinding)
Witness by Karen Hesse
Little House on the Prairie series by Laura Ingalls Wilder
Secret Garden and the Little Princess by Burnett
New Reads:
Turnabout by Margaret Peterson Haddix: “It isn’t natural for you to be younger than your great-grandchildren. We messed around with nature, and we shouldn’t have.” The most recent choice of our Mother/Daughter bookclub is a thought-provoking tale that debates morality vs. immortality and everyone will be eager to know the ending.
A Year Down Under and its sequel A Long Way from Chicago by Richard Peck: Heartwarming, masterful storytelling … “revealing a strong sense of place, a depth of characterization and, a rich sense of humor” (The Horn Book review)
The Breadwinner by Deborah Ellis: A hauntingly timely look at a twelve-year-old girl’s life under the Taliban in Afghanistan. When she is the only family member capable of earning a living, she disguises herself as a boy and takes over her father’s scribe business.
With a bottle of water and a throat lozenge at hand, enjoy the pleasure of the out loud word. Let us know through this paper if you have “great read-aloud” books and we will share them in future columns.
By Woody Woodworth, Owner, High Country Feed & Garden
When I hear people say “There are fewer birds this year. Nobody’s at my feeders,” my first response is “What kind of birdseed is in your feeders?” Not all birdseed is the same and the different types of seed can attract many combinations of birds and wildlife if it is the right mixture of seeds. Below are a few tips to draw birds to your feeders with different types of birdseed.
One popular seed is black oil sunflowers. It is generally inexpensive, available in large fifty-pound bags and can be fed to the wildlife many ways. Generally, you should have a tube feeder full of sunflowers at all times. Not only will a sunflower feeder attract birds to your feeding station, it will also keep birds like the Chickadee, Titmouse, Finches, Siskins, Jays and Nuthatches happy. During the spring, you are likely to spot the Grosbeak at the sunflower feeder as it migrates towards the high country. If you prefer not to clean up the seed hulls birds leave behind, the sunflower hearts are an alternative seed. They are processed out of the hulls and will attract Sparrows, Red-Winged Blackbirds, Juncos, Towhees, Nuthatches and Woodpeckers as well. Niger Thistle is set in a tube feeder also and will attract Purple Finch, House Finch, Pine Siskins and the ever-popular Goldfinch. These birds will add tons of color to your back yard when mating season arrives in early spring,
Raw peanuts are put on a platform feeder for the Fox Squirrels and Jays. The Jay will clean you out pretty fast as they fly in, grab a peanut and bury it for later, but they are great entertainment to watch. Shelled peanuts are fed through a small, cylindrical wire cage for the Nuthatches, Woodpeckers and Chickadees. Peanut hearts are pieces that can generally be put into a tube feeder or platform.
Platform feeders can also house seed mixes and seed blocks. One favorite mixed seed most birds love is called Songbird Mix. It contains millet, sunflower seed, peanut pieces, sunflower hearts, safflower, and thistle. Songbird Mix is also effective in a tube feeder or spread on the ground near the cover of low-lying shrubs. Another popular blend of seed, called Custom Wild Bird Mix, is less expensive than Songbird Mix, but contains more millet and milo that a lot of birds won’t eat and throw out of the feeder. Ground feeding birds like Mourning Doves, Juncos, Towhee, and White Throated Sparrow all love to eat what the others throw out.
Seed blocks are another blend of seed similar to the Wild Bird Mix. The only difference is that manufacturers process it into a firm, twenty-pound block of seed using molasses to keep it intact. It is suggested to set seed block on a platform or low-lying feeder. They are great for attracting the ground feeders, squirrels, and deer.
Attracting a variety of colorful and interesting birds to the backyard is easy! A successful feeding station should also include a birdbath or water source. Birds do not normally depend on bird feeders for survival, except perhaps in prolonged, severe winter weather. It is safe to feed birds all year-round as long as your feeders are cleaned regularly.
By Terry Galloway
Here’s how it works: Around the first to the middle of May, neighborhood representatives from the Gleneagle Civic Association (GCA) and representatives from other Gleneagle Homeowners’ Associations and some hearty McGinnis/GMAC Real Estate agents will deliver flyers to your doors. This will be your first reminder and a fact sheet with dates, times, numbers, and details to get you motivated. You will begin to see notices in the local papers soliciting participation before then. Near the beginning of June, you will be able to pick up your Garage Sale Survival Packets that will include helpful information, last minute tips, balloons, and garage sale paraphernalia. One or two local businesses will have these packets available for your pick up during business hours. Also, if you sign in at any of these locations when you pick up your packets, your address will be included on a directional map available to the buying public at both entrances to Gleneagle. As last year, there will be a garage sale hot line message center for updated information, announcements, questions, last minute hints, and suggestions.
Like years past, the sale will take place on a Friday and Saturday in June. All you need to do is choose one or both days, gather up all your treasures, put them out for display in your very own garages, and join in the fun.
It’s all very simple. The advertising is done for you. The week or two before the sale is when the blitz begins. You need only to watch it happen. Start collecting and organizing your treasures NOW! Then, a day or so before the sale, rummage through your Garage Sale Survival Packet so you will know all the ins and outs of a good “Garage Saler.” On the morning of the sale, hang out your balloons, put up your signs, position your lawn chairs, stock your coolers, open your garages, and wait for the crowds.
This year our popular local community event will remain within the contiguous community. We will attempt to include as many neighborhood associations bordering the Gleneagle Civic Association (GCA) and within Gleneagle as wish to participate. Also, we hope to see our neighbors in Sun Hills, Chaparral Hills, Jackson Creek, and Pleasant View join in our two-day event.
Heaven forbid! The treasures you really wanted someone else to own are still left after the crowds go home! What to do? Never fear, trucks will be stationed at a few convenient locations starting mid-afternoon on the final day of the sale and through Sunday afternoon. Every attempt will be made to anticipate the volume needed and have the trucks ready. Last year with the neighborhood cleanup activities and the garage sale so well attended, the need was greater than the trucks could contain.
If you have a special interest group with a publication into which a notice of our grand event can be placed, or if you would like extra flyers to post on a bulletin board, work place, or business, please give Terry Galloway or Dave Quintana a call at 487-3326 or 487-3469 (leave a voice mail). Ideas, suggestions, and volunteers are always appreciated to help make the community event fun and succe$$ful!
This year’s garage sale is being sponsored through the combined efforts of: Terry L. Galloway & David Quintana with McGinnis GMAC Tri-Lakes Marketing Center and The Gleneagle Civic Association.

By David W. Hale
We have all experienced situations in which two or more individuals want to simultaneously occupy and/or use the same limited space. As children, we “shared” with siblings in bedrooms, argued over “territory” in the back of the family station wagon, and squeezed into uncomfortable seats on the crowded school bus. Once we acquired our own bedroom, graduated to the front seats of station wagons, and became too cool to ride the bus, the kids’ bathroom and the shared school locker became the new battlegrounds for all-important space. As adults, we compete for space in parking lots, on ski slopes, and within dentists’ appointment books. And, with spouses, there is the issue of closet space.
In all such space conflicts, the outcomes depend upon the relative needs, power, assertiveness, and flexibility of the competitors, and on the impact the individuals have on one another. Some situations, such as those in bedrooms and station wagons, resolve into uneasy truces between territorial competitors. In other situations, such as those involving parking lots and closets, victory for one competitor often represents complete defeat or substantial concession for the other.
The extensive development along the Colorado Front Range has placed humans and many wildlife species in similar, but much more consequential competitions for space. Although many species of birds (e.g., magpies) and rodents (e.g., tree squirrels) do very well sharing space with humans, the outcomes of other human-animal competitions have been less benign. For example, in those neighborhoods located in wooded or foothills areas, humans and mule deer co-exist like squabbling siblings: deer irritate humans by feeding on flowers and garden vegetables, while careless drivers negatively impact the deer (no pun intended...) on the roadways. The building of homes, businesses, bridges, and dams near or on the streams that run out of and along the Front Range has resulted in considerable loss and fragmentation of streamside habitat for the Preble’s meadow jumping mouse, which is now listed as a “threatened species” by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. [This much-maligned mouse will be the subject of a future article in OCN.] The open space occupied by prairie dog colonies has been destroyed or significantly reduced by the bulldozing of large areas for yet more human construction and expansion. And, large herds of pronghorn have been displaced by the eastward expansion of cities such as Colorado Springs or have been decimated by development and traffic in the Monument area.
As a young teenager in the early 1970s, I came to know and admire the pronghorn’s many fascinating attributes by observation of local herds and through enthusiastic reading of Joe Van Wormer’s captivating 1969 book, The World of the Pronghorn. Our Antilocapra americana (Latin for “American goat-antelope”) is neither an antelope nor a goat; rather, it is a unique type of hoofed mammal, and is the sole species within the North American family Antilocapridae. In contrast, there are numerous species of ungulates within the familiar families Cervidae (mule deer, whitetail deer, elk, moose, caribou) and Bovidae (cattle, bighorn sheep, mountain goat, bison, African antelopes). As I walked the open prairie between Fuller Road and Northgate Road, my head full of these and other book-learned facts on pronghorn, I quickly gained first-hand knowledge of their many exceptional and interesting capabilities and habits. For example, they possess phenomenally acute eyesight. They always saw me before I saw them! Standing on prairie hilltops, I found that reports of their curiosity were quite accurate. If I remained still and let a long piece of brightly colored surveyors’ flagging flap in the wind, the inquisitive pronghorn often could not resist coming in for a closer look. Their willingness to approach interesting objects is perhaps a reflection of appropriate self-confidence. Among mammals, they are second only to African cheetahs in speed. The fastest of North American mammals, pronghorn have been clocked at speeds in excess of 60 mph! When I initially approached a herd, the mildly alarmed animals would flash (erect) their startlingly white rump hairs, and then effortlessly trot off at 30 mph or so. As I sullenly walked along fence lines after being left in the proverbial dust, the many tufts of tan and white hairs I saw in the lower wires revealed that pronghorn crawl through fences rather than jumping over them like deer. When a friend and his dogs joined one of my prairie outings, another difference between pronghorn and deer became evident. The wandering dogs found several weathered chunks of hornlike material, some of which had embedded hairs. These were pieces of the pronghorn’s namesake horns, which are composed of a bony core covered by a keratinized sheath. The black sheath (which seems irresistible to dogs) is shed annually, sometimes as an intact hollow “horn”; the bony core remains, and a new sheath develops. In contrast, deer antlers are composed entirely of bone and are completely shed each year. Bighorn sheep, mountain goats, and bison have true horns consisting of a bony core permanently covered in a hard keratin. I very much enjoyed these learning experiences with pronghorn during the early 1970s, so I resolved to look up these old friends when I returned to this area four years ago.
In the Monument area, the finger of prairie between I-25 and Black Forest was once home to a large group of pronghorn. According to Bob Davies, a terrestrial biologist with the Colorado Division of Wildlife, a herd of 50 to 60 pronghorn once lived in this area. Development, however, has resulted in considerable loss of habitat, with consequent erosion in the size of the herd. Also, the herd essentially became “fenced in” by I-25, Highway 105, Black Forest, and development in the Gleneagle area. When I moved to Jackson Creek in April 1999 (ours was the first house in the development), there was still a small band of pronghorn, about twelve individuals, roaming this large rectangle of remaining prairie. I often saw them near our house, tentatively exploring the newly laid sod or cautiously drinking from the sprinkler runoff. With the construction of the Jackson Creek Crossing shopping area and as the Keller and Classic sections became more developed, the pronghorn retreated and came no further southeast than the area of Kitchener Road and the site of Creekside Middle School. During the summer of 2000, I noted seven individuals: an adult buck, four adult does, and two fawns. By this time, the group spent most of their time on the prairie expanse bounded by I-25, Higby Road, Lyons Tail Road, Brookhart’s, and Jackson Creek. Unfortunately, at least one of these individuals was killed on the interstate during the latter half of 2000. Since then, their numbers have dwindled further. I am not sure if more pronghorn were killed on the roads, or whether some left the area. With the woods of Woodmoor and Black Forest and the buildings of the Jackson Creek and Gleneagle developments, there are seemingly no “corridors” through which the pronghorn could move to other areas of suitable habitat. Perhaps the “missing” individuals have found some way over to the small bands that live in the open areas south of Northgate Road and along Highway 83.
Presently, only two adult does remain from the original herd of 50 to 60 pronghorn in the Monument area. I see them nearly every day in the area west of Jackson Creek, between the power substation and Brookhart’s. Like the pronghorn I followed in my boyhood days, these two individuals cannot suppress their innate curiosity; when I pull off on Struthers Road and stand at the fence, they often stop grazing and walk towards me for a better look (but, not close enough for a decent photo...). Unfortunately, the outlook for these appealing animals is bleak. According to Bob Davies, “Unless adequate open space consisting of prairie habitat is saved, we will most likely lose this population in the future.” The disappearance of these pronghorn will represent a considerable loss to the wildlife diversity we all enjoy in the Monument area. And, this will become yet another sad example of wildlife defeat in our ongoing competition for space.
By Heidi M. Juell, Board Member, Tri-Lakes Center for the Arts
Fun was had by all - those who entertained the crowd and those in the crowd that heard previously unheard renditions of their favorite songs. Dave Jones, past president of the board, along with Randy Hacker, current president and fellow Sertoma member Leon Tenney sang a creative version of “The Lion Sleeps Tonight.” While Randy and Leon sang back up, Dave used a voice he could only have learned from his screaming dental patients.
The show took a break from Karaoke when Whitney Hayes and Tripp Fountain performed broadway show tunes. Their duet of “I Can Do Anything You Can Do Better” from Annie Get Your Gun was beautifully sung and performed. Pledges from the audience brought them back on stage for more.
The audience, who danced, tapped their toes, clapped, and sang along with many of the performances, was appreciative of the talent at the show. It was an impressive evening with lots of great music and memorable performances.
If you aren’t already a member of the Tri-Lakes Center for the Arts, please join now. Call the center at 481-0475 for membership information and schedules of upcoming events. You won’t want to miss the next Karaoke event at the center!
By Sue Buell
The Friends of Ben Lomond is sponsoring an art show March 22 through April 17 at the Tri-Lakes Center for the Arts, Lucille Owens Gallery, in Palmer Lake with a gala opening reception, Friday, March 22, 7 pm to 9 pm.
|
Artists are invited to submit original nature-related artworks showcasing Ben Lomond Mountain and the surrounding area. | |
|
The cost for entering the show is $5 per piece entered with a limit of 5 pieces. Tax-deductible checks are to be made out to the “Trails and Open Space Coalition” with memo line “Ben Lomond Mountain.” Anyone who donates $25 or more to FOBL will receive a one-year membership in the Trails and Open Space Coalition. TOSC publishes a newsletter, sponsors events, and coordinates trail and open space planning in El Paso County. | |
|
All artwork must be available for sale. There will be a tax-deductible donation of 30% of the sale price for all pieces sold. The donation will be split between FOBL and the Tri-Lakes Center for the Arts. | |
|
All artwork must be ready to hang and brought to the Tri-Lakes Center between Saturday, March 9th and Friday, March 15th. |
For more information on this event and registration forms for artists, contact Paula Primavera at 481-4760 or primo2@ix.netcom.com.
|
Home About Advertise Archive Calendar Contact Donate Help Links Maps Subscribe Topics UpdatesContact us at (719) 488-3455, ads@ourcommunitynews.org, editor@ourcommunitynews.org, or P.O. Box 1742, Monument, Colorado 80132-1742.This page was last modified on August 20, 2010. Home page: www.ourcommunitynews.org.Copyright © 2001-2010 Our Community News, Inc. All Rights Reserved. |